Hyman David A, Sage William M
University of Illinois, Champaign, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):W312-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w312. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
The merits of tax exemption for nonprofit health care providers have been hotly debated for decades. Mark Schlesinger and Brad Gray provide a useful, dispassionate meta-analysis of past research; they conclude that there are real differences in the performance of nonprofit and for-profit hospitals and nursing homes, although they vary along several key dimensions. Unfortunately, their findings offer no insight on whether these differences are large enough to justify a sizable subsidy and whether it makes more sense to use an undifferentiated subsidy tied to status (current practice), or a graduated subsidy tied to quantifiable and objective measures of performance.
几十年来,非营利性医疗服务提供者免税的优点一直备受激烈争论。马克·施莱辛格和布拉德·格雷对过去的研究进行了有益且客观的综合分析;他们得出结论,非营利性医院和养老院与营利性医院和养老院在绩效方面确实存在差异,尽管这些差异体现在几个关键维度上。不幸的是,他们的研究结果并未就这些差异是否大到足以证明给予可观补贴的合理性,以及使用与机构性质挂钩的统一补贴(现行做法)还是与可量化和客观绩效指标挂钩的分级补贴是否更合理提供任何见解。