Wilson Brenda J, Torrance Nicola, Mollison Jill, Watson M Stuart, Douglas Alison, Miedzybrodzka Zosia, Gordon Richard, Wordsworth Sarah, Campbell Marion, Haites Neva, Grant Adrian
Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK.
Fam Pract. 2006 Oct;23(5):537-44. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml026. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
GPs are increasingly expected to meet the needs of patients concerned about their risk of inherited breast cancer, but may lack skills or confidence to use complex management guidelines. We developed an evidence-based, multifaceted intervention intended to promote confidence and skills in this area.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in improving GP confidence in managing patients concerned about genetic risk of breast cancer.
Cluster randomized controlled trial.
General practices in the Grampian region of Scotland.
GPs and the patients they referred for genetic counselling for risk of breast cancer.
GPs' self-reported confidence in four activities related to genetics; rates of referral of patients at elevated genetic risk; and referred patients' understanding of cancer risk factors.
No statistically significant differences were observed between intervention and control arms in the primary or secondary outcomes. A possible effect of the intervention on the proportion of referred patients who were at elevated risk could not be discounted. Only a small proportion of intervention GPs attended the educational session, were aware or the software, or made use of it in practice.
No convincing evidence of the effectiveness of the intervention was found, probably reflecting barriers to its use in routine practice.
人们越来越期望全科医生满足那些担心遗传性乳腺癌风险的患者的需求,但他们可能缺乏使用复杂管理指南的技能或信心。我们制定了一项基于证据的多方面干预措施,旨在提升这方面的信心和技能。
评估该干预措施在提高全科医生管理担心乳腺癌遗传风险患者方面信心的有效性。
整群随机对照试验。
苏格兰格兰扁地区的全科诊所。
全科医生及其转介至遗传咨询门诊咨询乳腺癌风险的患者。
全科医生自我报告的在四项与遗传学相关活动中的信心;遗传风险升高患者的转诊率;以及转诊患者对癌症风险因素的理解。
在主要或次要结局方面,干预组和对照组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。不能排除干预措施对转诊的高风险患者比例可能产生的影响。只有一小部分参与干预的全科医生参加了教育课程,知晓该软件,或在实践中使用了该软件。
未发现该干预措施有效的令人信服的证据,这可能反映了其在常规实践中使用存在的障碍。