• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族史患者的转诊——全科医生的知识与期望。

Referral of patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer--GPs' knowledge and expectations.

作者信息

Rose P W, Watson E, Yudkin P, Emery J, Murphy M, Fuller A, Lucassen A

机构信息

Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2001 Oct;18(5):487-90. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.5.487.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/18.5.487
PMID:11604368
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary care is expected to play a significant role in the management of patients with genetic problems. Currently, this particularly involves patients with a family history of cancer. If GPs are to exercise their gatekeeper role efficiently in this area, they must be able to evaluate genetic risk and make appropriate referral decisions.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine GPs' ability to assess risk and to make appropriate referral decisions for women with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, and to determine their expectations of a referral to secondary care.

METHOD

A questionnaire survey was carried out of the 282 GP principals working within Bedfordshire Health Authority. GPs were asked to make decisions for six simulated cases of women presenting with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 164 (58%) GPs returned completed questionnaires. Across the six family histories, the percentage of GPs making an appropriate risk assessment ranged from 21% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14-27%] to 63% (95% CI 56-71%), and an appropriate referral decision ranged from 40% (95% CI 32-48%) to 80% (95% CI 73-86%). Regardless of their accuracy of risk assessment, most GPs were consistent in deciding not to refer low risk women and to refer moderate and high risk women (range 71-85% of GPs for the six family histories). Only 43 (26%, 95% CI 20-33%) of GPs knew the three most important criteria for risk assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs require more help and education to enable them to perform their gatekeeper role satisfactorily when assessing patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer.

摘要

背景

初级保健有望在遗传问题患者的管理中发挥重要作用。目前,这尤其涉及有癌症家族史的患者。如果全科医生要在这一领域有效地发挥把关人的作用,他们必须能够评估遗传风险并做出适当的转诊决定。

目的

本研究的目的是检验全科医生评估风险的能力,以及为有乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族史的女性做出适当转诊决定的能力,并确定他们对转诊至二级保健机构的期望。

方法

对在贝德福德郡卫生局工作的282名全科医生负责人进行了问卷调查。要求全科医生对6例有乳腺癌或卵巢癌家族史的女性模拟病例做出决定。

结果

共有164名(58%)全科医生返回了完整的问卷。在这6种家族病史中,做出适当风险评估的全科医生比例从21%[95%置信区间(CI)14 - 27%]到63%(95%CI 56 - 71%)不等,做出适当转诊决定的比例从40%(95%CI 32 - 48%)到80%(95%CI 73 - 86%)不等。无论风险评估的准确性如何,大多数全科医生在决定不转诊低风险女性以及转诊中度和高风险女性方面是一致的(6种家族病史中全科医生的比例范围为71 - 85%)。只有43名(26%,95%CI 20 - 33%)全科医生知道风险评估的三个最重要标准。

结论

全科医生需要更多的帮助和教育,以便在评估有乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族史的患者时能够令人满意地发挥其把关人的作用。

相似文献

1
Referral of patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer--GPs' knowledge and expectations.有乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族史患者的转诊——全科医生的知识与期望。
Fam Pract. 2001 Oct;18(5):487-90. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.5.487.
2
Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial.评估两种教育干预措施对全科医生管理家族性乳腺癌/卵巢癌病例的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Oct;51(471):817-21.
3
A study of GP referrals to a family cancer clinic for breast/ovarian cancer.一项关于全科医生将患者转诊至家庭癌症诊所进行乳腺癌/卵巢癌诊治的研究。
Fam Pract. 2001 Apr;18(2):131-4. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.2.131.
4
GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice.全科医生对其在癌症遗传学服务中的角色及当前实践的看法。
Fam Pract. 1999 Oct;16(5):468-74. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.5.468.
5
In the wake of Angelina - managing a family history of breast cancer.在安吉丽娜之后——应对乳腺癌家族病史。
Aust Fam Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;43(1):76-8.
6
The assessment of genetic risk of breast cancer: a set of GP guidelines.乳腺癌遗传风险评估:一套全科医生指南。
Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;16(1):71-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.1.71.
7
Referral for genetic counselling during pregnancy: limited alertness and awareness about genetic risk factors among GPs.孕期转诊进行遗传咨询:全科医生对遗传风险因素的警觉性和认知有限。
Fam Pract. 2003 Apr;20(2):135-41. doi: 10.1093/fampra/20.2.135.
8
Experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to familial risk of breast cancer: a comparison of the views of GPs and practice nurses.关于乳腺癌家族风险的新遗传学的经验与期望:全科医生和执业护士观点比较
Fam Pract. 2001 Oct;18(5):491-4. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.5.491.
9
GPs' opinions of their role in prenatal genetic services: a cross-sectional survey.全科医生对其在产前基因服务中角色的看法:一项横断面调查。
Fam Pract. 2006 Feb;23(1):106-10. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi088. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
10
Cluster randomized trial of a multifaceted primary care decision-support intervention for inherited breast cancer risk.针对遗传性乳腺癌风险的多方面初级保健决策支持干预措施的整群随机试验。
Fam Pract. 2006 Oct;23(5):537-44. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml026. Epub 2006 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Personalized, Interactive, Web-Based Clinical Decision Tools Available for Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening in the United States.美国可用于乳腺癌预防和筛查的个性化、交互式、基于网络的临床决策工具的范围综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 17;9(1):23814683241236511. doi: 10.1177/23814683241236511. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
2
Doctor-Patient Cancer Screening Communications among Church-based Chinese Adults - The Role of Caregiver Experience and Family History.基于教会的中国成年人医患癌症筛查交流——以照顾者经验和家族史为视角
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):241-247. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.1.241.
3
Health education interventions to promote early presentation and referral for women with symptoms of endometrial cancer.
促进有子宫内膜癌症状的女性尽早就诊和转诊的健康教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 13;3(3):CD013253. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013253.pub2.
4
Ensuring Best Practice in Genomic Education and Evaluation: A Program Logic Approach.确保基因组学教育与评估的最佳实践:一种项目逻辑方法。
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 8;10:1057. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01057. eCollection 2019.
5
Genetics in primary care: validating a tool to pre-symptomatically assess common disease risk using an Australian questionnaire on family history.初级保健中的遗传学:使用一份关于家族史的澳大利亚问卷来验证一种用于症状前评估常见疾病风险的工具。
Clin Transl Med. 2019 May 2;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40169-019-0233-x.
6
Accuracy of ovarian and colon cancer risk assessments by U.S. physicians.美国医生对卵巢癌和结肠癌风险评估的准确性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 May;29(5):741-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2768-2. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
7
Effectiveness of oncogenetics training on general practitioners' consultation skills: a randomized controlled trial.基于肿瘤遗传学的培训对全科医生咨询技能的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Genet Med. 2014 Jan;16(1):45-52. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.69. Epub 2013 May 30.
8
Proposed roadmap to stepwise integration of genetics in family medicine and clinical research.逐步将遗传学纳入家庭医学和临床研究的整合路线图。
Clin Transl Med. 2013 Feb 16;2(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2001-1326-2-5.
9
Patterns of cancer genetic testing: a randomized survey of Oregon clinicians.癌症基因检测模式:俄勒冈州临床医生的随机调查
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:294730. doi: 10.1155/2012/294730. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
10
Symptoms and risk factors of ovarian cancer: a survey in primary care.卵巢癌的症状与风险因素:一项初级保健调查
ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:754197. doi: 10.5402/2012/754197. Epub 2012 Aug 23.