Suppr超能文献

感染艾滋病毒高危人群对艾滋病毒预防项目和服务的使用及接触情况。

Use of and exposure to HIV prevention programs and services by persons at high risk for HIV.

作者信息

Kellerman Scott E, Drake Amy, Lansky Amy, Klevens R Monina

机构信息

City of New York, Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, Bureau of HIV/AIDS Prevention & Control, New York, New York 10013, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006 Jun;20(6):391-8. doi: 10.1089/apc.2006.20.391.

Abstract

Although HIV information is widely available in this country, little is known about how commonly used HIV prevention activities reach persons at highest risk for HIV. In this paper, we describe the extent to which HIV prevention strategies reach a sample of high-risk persons and whether such exposure correlates with having been tested for HIV. Data are from the 2000 HIV Testing Survey, an anonymous interview study of men who have sex with men (MSM), injection drug users (IDU), and high-risk heterosexuals (HRH), recruited from appropriate venues in seven states and New York City. We report the proportion of persons exposed to three types of interventions: information (media messages, brochures), counseling or skills-building (group counseling, role play, calling an AIDS hotline), and prevention supplies (provision of condoms, bleach kits), stratified by HIV testing status (ever, never). Exposure to information interventions was high among 2491 respondents (85%-96%) and did not differ by testing status. Use of counseling or skills-building interventions varied by testing status for IDU (8% untested versus 41% tested, p < 0.01) and HRH (14% versus 20%, p = 0.03) but not MSM (15% versus 23%, p = 0.08). Among tested IDU, those receiving bleach kits were more likely to report consistent bleach use when injecting with nonsterile needles (25% versus 9%, p = 0.003). Exposure to HIV prevention information is high but exposure to counseling or skills-building interventions is less common and more prevalent among those previously tested. Prevention initiatives should focus on counseling and testing, skills-building, and prevention supplies.

摘要

尽管在这个国家,艾滋病病毒(HIV)相关信息广泛可得,但对于常用的HIV预防活动在HIV高危人群中的普及程度却知之甚少。在本文中,我们描述了HIV预防策略在高危人群样本中的覆盖范围,以及这种接触与HIV检测情况是否相关。数据来自2000年HIV检测调查,这是一项对男男性行为者(MSM)、注射吸毒者(IDU)和高危异性恋者(HRH)进行的匿名访谈研究,研究对象从七个州和纽约市的合适场所招募。我们报告了接触三种干预措施的人群比例:信息(媒体信息、宣传册)、咨询或技能培养(团体咨询、角色扮演、拨打艾滋病热线)以及预防用品(提供避孕套、漂白剂套装),并按HIV检测状态(曾检测、从未检测)进行分层。在2491名受访者中,接触信息干预措施的比例很高(85%-96%),且不因检测状态而有所不同。咨询或技能培养干预措施的使用情况因检测状态而异,对于注射吸毒者(未检测者为8%,检测者为41%,p<0.01)和高危异性恋者(分别为14%和20%,p = 0.03)是这样,但对于男男性行为者则不然(分别为15%和23%,p = 0.08)。在接受检测的注射吸毒者中,那些收到漂白剂套装的人在使用非无菌针头注射时更有可能报告持续使用漂白剂(25%对9%,p = 0.003)。接触HIV预防信息的比例很高,但接触咨询或技能培养干预措施的情况较少见,且在之前接受检测的人群中更为普遍。预防举措应侧重于咨询与检测、技能培养以及预防用品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验