Rommers Mirjam K, Van der Lely Netty, Egberts Toine C G, van den Bemt Patricia M L A
Hospital Pharmacy Midden-Brabant; TweeSteden Hospital and St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Crit Care. 2006;10(3):R93. doi: 10.1186/cc4952. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
Intensive care unit (ICU) patients often suffer from subcutaneous oedema, due to administration of large fluid volumes and the underlying pathophysiological condition. It is unknown whether the presence of subcutaneous oedema impairs the absorption of dalteparin, a low molecular weight heparin, when it is given by subcutaneous administration for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. The objective of this study is to compare the anti-Xa activity of dalteparin after subcutaneous administration in ICU patients with and without subcutaneous oedema.
This non-randomized open parallel group follow-up pilot study was conducted in two mixed medical-surgical intensive care units at two teaching hospitals. Seven ICU patients with subcutaneous oedema (index group) and seven ICU patients without subcutaneous oedema (reference group) were studied. Anti-Xa activity was determined at 0, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after subcutaneous administration of 2,500 IU dalteparin. Plasma concentrations of factor anti-Xa activity were measured using a chromogenic factor Xa inhibition assay.
The characteristics of the index group were: age, 58 years; male/female ratio, 5/2; body mass index at admission, 23.4 kg/m2 (at study day, 30.6 kg/m2). The characteristics of the reference group were: age, 49 years; male/female ratio, 6/1; body mass index at admission, 24.8 kg/m2 (at study day, 25.0 kg/m2). In the index group, creatinine clearance was lower compared to the reference group (71 versus 131 ml/minute, p = 0.003). Sequential organ failure assessment score did not differ between index and reference groups (4 versus 5). Mean arterial pressure was comparable between index and reference groups (91 versus 95 mmHg) and within the normal range. The mean Cmax value was not different between ICU patients with and without subcutaneous oedema (0.15 +/- 0.02 versus 0.14 +/- 0.02 IU/ml, p = 0.34). In the index group, the mean AUC(0-24 h) value was slightly higher compared with the reference group (1.50 +/- 0.31 versus 1.15 +/- 0.25 h.IU/ml, p = 0.31). This difference was not significant.
In this pilot study, there was no clinically relevant difference in anti-Xa activity after subcutaneous administration of 2,500 IU dalteparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis between ICU patients with and without subcutaneous oedema. Critically ill patients seem to have lower anti-Xa activity levels than healthy volunteers.
重症监护病房(ICU)患者常因大量输液及潜在病理生理状况而出现皮下水肿。对于在皮下注射低分子量肝素达肝素以预防静脉血栓栓塞时,皮下水肿的存在是否会影响达肝素的吸收尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较皮下注射达肝素后,有和没有皮下水肿的ICU患者的抗Xa活性。
本非随机开放平行组随访前瞻性研究在两家教学医院的两个内科-外科混合重症监护病房进行。研究了7例有皮下水肿的ICU患者(指数组)和7例无皮下水肿的ICU患者(参照组)。皮下注射2500IU达肝素后0、3、4、6、8、12和24小时测定抗Xa活性。使用发色底物法测定血浆中抗Xa活性因子的浓度。
指数组的特征为:年龄58岁;男/女比例5/2;入院时体重指数23.4kg/m²(研究日为30.6kg/m²)。参照组的特征为:年龄49岁;男/女比例6/1;入院时体重指数24.8kg/m²(研究日为25.0kg/m²)。指数组的肌酐清除率低于参照组(71对131ml/分钟,p=0.003)。序贯器官衰竭评估评分在指数组和参照组之间无差异(4对5)。平均动脉压在指数组和参照组之间相当(91对95mmHg)且在正常范围内。有和没有皮下水肿的ICU患者的平均Cmax值无差异(0.15±0.02对0.14±0.02IU/ml,p=0.34)。在指数组中,平均AUC(0 - 24h)值略高于参照组(1.50±0.31对1.15±0.25h.IU/ml,p=0.31)。这种差异不显著。
在本前瞻性研究中,皮下注射2500IU达肝素预防静脉血栓栓塞后,有和没有皮下水肿的ICU患者的抗Xa活性在临床上无相关差异。危重症患者的抗Xa活性水平似乎低于健康志愿者。