Guevara-López Uriah, Covarrubias-Gómez Alfredo, Gutierrez-Acar Hilario, Aldrete J Antonio, López-Muñoz Francisco J, Martínez-Benítez Braulio
Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, National Institute for Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, DF
Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):99-102, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221184.63402.24.
Neuraxial administration of nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs has been suggested as an alternative in the management of intractable pain, but there is little evidence that the neurotoxic effects of indomethacin by this route of administration have been evaluated. In this study, we evaluated histological neurotoxicity of indomethacin after its subarachnoid administration in guinea pigs. The hypothesis tested was "Does subarachnoid administration of indomethacin produce damage in the spinal cord of guinea pigs?" Ten male guinea pigs were anesthetized, and a polyamide catheter connected to a subcutaneous osmotic micro-pump was implanted at the L2-3 level. Animals were randomly assigned in 2 groups of 5 animals each. Indomethacin or saline solution was administered by continuous infusion (0.5 microL/h) for 14 days. Neurotoxicity was determined by spinal cord histopathology. There was no evidence of toxicity in the histological examinations of either group. These data suggest that subarachnoid administration of indomethacin infusion, at these doses, did not produce lesions typical of neurotoxicity in the spinal cord. We have concluded that epidural administration of indomethacin may be considered an alternative for application in human pain management, although more studies to determine its safety are required.
非甾体抗炎药的神经轴给药已被提议作为治疗顽固性疼痛的一种替代方法,但几乎没有证据表明通过这种给药途径给予吲哚美辛的神经毒性作用已得到评估。在本研究中,我们评估了豚鼠蛛网膜下腔给予吲哚美辛后的组织学神经毒性。所检验的假设是“蛛网膜下腔给予吲哚美辛是否会对豚鼠脊髓造成损伤?”将10只雄性豚鼠麻醉,在L2-3水平植入连接皮下渗透微型泵的聚酰胺导管。动物被随机分为2组,每组5只动物。通过连续输注(0.5微升/小时)给予吲哚美辛或生理盐水14天。通过脊髓组织病理学确定神经毒性。两组的组织学检查均未发现毒性证据。这些数据表明,以这些剂量蛛网膜下腔给予吲哚美辛输注不会产生脊髓典型的神经毒性损伤。我们得出结论,尽管需要更多研究来确定其安全性,但硬膜外给予吲哚美辛可被视为用于人类疼痛管理的一种替代方法。