• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数据收集的频率、间隔和时间采样方法比较。

A comparison of frequency, interval, and time-sampling methods of data collection.

机构信息

Georgia Retardation Center.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1976;9(4):501-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-501.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1976.9-501
PMID:16795533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1312027/
Abstract

Data representing high, medium, and low response rates in constant and nonconstant patterns were generated by electromechanical equipment to determine whether the same data collected by time-sampling, interval recording, and frequency recording would be represented similarly by each method. Results indicated: (1) that time-sampling provided an extremely inaccurate estimate of responding, and (2) that interval recording accurately represented responding of low and medium rates, but grossly underestimated high-rate responding.

摘要

通过机电设备生成高、中、低反应率的数据,以确定通过时间采样、间隔记录和频率记录收集的相同数据是否会以相同的方式被每种方法表示。结果表明:(1)时间采样提供了对反应的极其不准确的估计,(2)间隔记录准确地表示了低和中反应率的反应,但严重低估了高反应率的反应。

相似文献

1
A comparison of frequency, interval, and time-sampling methods of data collection.数据收集的频率、间隔和时间采样方法比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1976;9(4):501-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-501.
2
A simulated comparison of behavioural observation sampling methods.一种行为观察抽样方法的模拟比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 23;12(1):3096. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07169-5.
3
Recording of ECG signals on a portable MiniDisc recorder for time and frequency domain heart rate variability analysis.在便携式迷你光盘录音机上记录心电图信号,用于时域和频域心率变异性分析。
Physiol Behav. 2005 Jan 17;83(5):729-38. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.09.007.
4
Technical note: Comparison of instantaneous sampling and continuous observation of dairy cattle behavior in freestall housing.技术说明:散栏式牛舍中奶牛行为的瞬时采样与连续观察比较
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Oct;99(10):8341-8346. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11351. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
5
Estimating optimal observational sampling frequency of behaviors for cattle fed high- and low-forage diets.估算高纤维和低纤维日粮下牛行为的最佳观测采样频率。
J Anim Sci. 2018 Apr 3;96(3):783-796. doi: 10.1093/jas/skx073.
6
Behavioral sampling techniques for feedlot cattle.饲养场牛的行为采样技术
J Anim Sci. 2001 May;79(5):1189-93. doi: 10.2527/2001.7951189x.
7
Methods of time sampling: A reappraisal of momentary time sampling and partial interval recording.时间抽样方法:对瞬时时间抽样和部分区间记录的重新评价。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Spring;19(1):73-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-73.
8
A comparison of reliability measures for continuous and discontinuous recording methods: inflated agreement scores with partial interval recording and momentary time sampling for duration events.连续记录法和不连续记录法的可靠性比较:持续时间事件的部分区间记录和瞬时时间抽样会导致过高的一致性评分。
Behav Modif. 2011 Jul;35(4):389-402. doi: 10.1177/0145445511405512.
9
When continuous observations just won't do: developing accurate and efficient sampling strategies for the laying hen.当连续观察不可行时:为蛋鸡制定准确高效的抽样策略。
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
10
Validating intrinsic markers and optimizing spot sampling frequency to estimate fecal outputs.验证内在标志物并优化斑点采样频率以估计粪便排出量。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Sep;101(9):7980-7989. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14717. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A simulated comparison of behavioural observation sampling methods.一种行为观察抽样方法的模拟比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 23;12(1):3096. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07169-5.
2
Simulation Theory Applied to Direct Systematic Observation.应用于直接系统观察的模拟理论
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 8;8:905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00905. eCollection 2017.
3
Interval sampling methods and measurement error: a computer simulation.间隔抽样方法与测量误差:计算机模拟
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Spring;47(1):83-100. doi: 10.1002/jaba.93. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
4
Influences of response rate and distribution on the calculation of interobserver reliability scores.应答率和分布对观察者间可靠性评分计算的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):753-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-753.
5
Current measurement in applied behavior analysis.应用行为分析中的电流测量。
Behav Anal. 1981 Spring;4(1):19-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03391849.
6
Distinguishing between applied research and practice.区分应用研究与实践。
Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;19(1):35-47. doi: 10.1007/BF03392737.
7
Establishing the feasibility of direct observation in the assessment of tics in children with chronic tic disorders.确定直接观察在评估慢性抽动障碍儿童抽动症状中的可行性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Winter;39(4):429-40. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.63-06.
8
Methods of time sampling: A reappraisal of momentary time sampling and partial interval recording.时间抽样方法:对瞬时时间抽样和部分区间记录的重新评价。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Spring;19(1):73-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-73.
9
Simplifying continuous monitoring of multiple-response/multiple-subject classroom interactions.简化多响应/多主体课堂互动的连续监测。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;15(1):183-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-183.
10
The effects of instructions and calculation procedures on observers' accuracy, agreement, and calculation correctness.指导语和计算程序对观察者准确性、一致性和计算正确性的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):479-89. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-479.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences among common methods for calculating interobserver agreement.计算观察者间一致性的常用方法之间的差异。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Spring;9(1):109-13. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-109.
2
An evaluation of time-sample measures of behavior.行为时间样本测量的评价。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Winter;8(4):463-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-463.
3
A brief report on a comparison of time-sampling procedures.关于时间抽样程序比较的简要报告。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):623-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-623.
4
A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts.一种将描述性和实验性实地研究整合到数据和经验概念层面的方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):175-91. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-175.