• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术之前的抗血小板治疗——仍有改进空间。

Antiplatelet therapy prior to carotid endarterectomy--still room for improvement.

作者信息

Assadian A, Eidher U, Senekowitsch C, Rotter R, Löchli S, Hagmüller G W, Knöbl P

机构信息

Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Wilhelminenspital Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Vasa. 2006 May;35(2):96-100. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526.35.2.96.

DOI:10.1024/0301-1526.35.2.96
PMID:16796008
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is one of the most important modalities for secondary prevention of ischemic events. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the current practice of antiplatelet therapy in patients with high grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA), who were referred by neurologists, stroke physicians and cardiologists for carotid endarterectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients referred to our department for carotid endarterectomy with ICA stenosis (> 70% according to NASCET criteria) were prospectively evaluated regarding atherosclerosis risk factors and current antiplatelet therapy. During a 7 month period, 235 patients were scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Their mean age was 70 years (range 42 years to 95 years), 91 patients were female (39%), 144 male (61%). 122 patients (52%) had a symptomatic ICA stenosis, 113 (48%) an asymptomatic ICA stenosis.

RESULTS

Of the 235 patients, 29 were either on low molecular weight heparin or vitamin K antagonists for reasons other than ICA stenosis and were therefore excluded from analysis. Therefore, 206 patients (88%) were evaluated for antiplatelet therapy prescribed by their admitting physicians. Of these patients, 77 (37%) (42 (41%) symptomatic and 35 (34%) asymptomatic patients) did not receive any antithrombotic therapy prior to admission for surgery. The majority of patients received aspirin preoperatively (106 patients, 51.5%) 13 (6%) patients were on clopidogrel and 10 (5%) on dual therapy with Aspirin and clopidogrel.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one third of patients awaiting carotid endarterectomy did not receive any antiplatelet therapy, despite high grade ICA stenosis. Since this practice does not meet the current guidelines, campaigns to increase the awareness of this problem are urgently needed.

摘要

背景

抗血小板治疗是缺血性事件二级预防的最重要方式之一。这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估由神经科医生、中风科医生和心脏病科医生转诊来进行颈动脉内膜切除术的颈内动脉(ICA)高度狭窄患者的抗血小板治疗现状。

患者与方法

前瞻性评估转诊至我科进行ICA狭窄(根据北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验协作组(NASCET)标准>70%)颈动脉内膜切除术的患者的动脉粥样硬化危险因素及当前抗血小板治疗情况。在7个月期间,235例患者计划进行颈动脉内膜切除术。他们的平均年龄为70岁(范围42岁至95岁),91例为女性(39%),144例为男性(61%)。122例患者(52%)有症状性ICA狭窄,113例(48%)有无症状性ICA狭窄。

结果

235例患者中,29例因ICA狭窄以外的原因使用低分子量肝素或维生素K拮抗剂,因此被排除在分析之外。因此,对206例患者(88%)进行了其主治医生开具的抗血小板治疗评估。在这些患者中,77例(37%)(42例(41%)有症状患者和35例(34%)无症状患者)在手术入院前未接受任何抗血栓治疗。大多数患者术前接受阿司匹林治疗(106例患者,51.5%),13例(6%)患者使用氯吡格雷,10例(5%)患者接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双联治疗。

结论

尽管ICA高度狭窄,但超过三分之一等待颈动脉内膜切除术的患者未接受任何抗血小板治疗。由于这种做法不符合当前指南,迫切需要开展提高对此问题认识的活动。

相似文献

1
Antiplatelet therapy prior to carotid endarterectomy--still room for improvement.颈动脉内膜切除术之前的抗血小板治疗——仍有改进空间。
Vasa. 2006 May;35(2):96-100. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526.35.2.96.
2
Dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel and aspirin) is associated with increased all-cause mortality after carotid revascularization for asymptomatic carotid disease.对于无症状性颈动脉疾病,在进行颈动脉血运重建术后,双重抗血小板治疗(氯吡格雷和阿司匹林)与全因死亡率增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):950-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.087. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
3
Primary stroke unit treatment followed by very early carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis after acute stroke.急性卒中后采用初级卒中单元治疗,随后对颈动脉狭窄进行极早期颈动脉内膜切除术。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(4):276-81. doi: 10.1159/000094016. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
4
Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin after carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联合抗血小板治疗。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2001 Dec;13(12):767-71.
5
Outcome in patients with symptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery.有症状的颈内动脉闭塞患者的预后。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Jun;19(6):579-86. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1129.
6
Prospective registry of carotid artery stenting in Japan--investigation on device and antiplatelet for carotid artery stenting.日本颈动脉支架置入术前瞻性注册研究——颈动脉支架置入术的器械与抗血小板治疗调查
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Jul;23(6):1374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.11.018. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
7
Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin in symptomatic carotid stenosis evaluated using doppler embolic signal detection: the Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CARESS) trial.使用多普勒栓子信号检测评估氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联合抗血小板治疗有症状颈动脉狭窄:氯吡格雷与阿司匹林降低有症状颈动脉狭窄栓子(CARESS)试验
Circulation. 2005 May 3;111(17):2233-40. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000163561.90680.1C. Epub 2005 Apr 25.
8
Carotid endarterectomy in the acute phase of stroke-in-evolution is safe and effective in selected patients.在进展性卒中的急性期行颈动脉内膜切除术对选择的患者是安全且有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):701-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.09.054. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
9
Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy in Moderate to Severe Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.中重度无症状和有症状颈动脉狭窄的最佳抗血小板治疗:文献综述
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;57(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
Carotid Endarterectomy and Concurrent Clopidogrel Use: National Practice Patterns in the United States.颈动脉内膜切除术与氯吡格雷联合使用:美国的全国实践模式
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e315-e320. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.199. Epub 2018 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Using risk models to improve patient selection for high-risk vascular surgery.使用风险模型改善高危血管手术的患者选择。
Scientifica (Cairo). 2012;2012:132370. doi: 10.6064/2012/132370. Epub 2012 Dec 13.