Suppr超能文献

通过视频会议进行远程精神病学治疗与面对面传统精神病学治疗的随机临床试验。

Randomized clinical trial of telepsychiatry through videoconference versus face-to-face conventional psychiatric treatment.

作者信息

De Las Cuevas Carlos, Arredondo M Teresa, Cabrera M Fernanda, Sulzenbacher Hubert, Meise Ulrich

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands Health Service, Spain.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2006 Jun;12(3):341-50. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.341.

Abstract

Although telepsychiatry in the form of videoconferencing has been well received in terms of increasing access to care and user satisfaction, few data on treatment outcomes and efficacy from telepsychiatry applications are available at the present time. This paper evaluates the efficacy of telepsychiatry through videoconference in the treatment of mental disorders by comparing to face-to-face conventional (F2FC) treatment. We carried out a randomized clinical trial where 140 psychiatric outpatients were randomized to either F2FC treatment or videoconference telepsychiatry (VCTP) treatment. Patients were diagnosed according to International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) criteria using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Treatment involves eight consultations lasting 30 minutes over the 24-week study period. Patients received pertinent psychotropic medication plus cognitive- behavioral therapy during sessions. The same psychiatrist diagnosed and treated all the patients that were recruited from the Community Mental Health Centre of San Sebastian de la Gomera, in the Canary Islands. Change in psychiatric test scores served as the primary efficacy criterion. Efficacy was determined by comparing baseline (visit 1) Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I) scales as well as Global Indexes (GSI, PSDI, and PST) from SCL-90R with scores obtained at the end of the study period (week 24). Response was defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2. Reliable Change Indexes were computed in SCL-90R Global Indexes scores. Of 140 patients randomized, 130 completed 24 weeks of treatment. Only 4 patients dropped out prematurely from the study in VCTP and 6 in F2FC. The study involves 534 teleconsultations, 522 F2FC consultations, and more than 500 hours of clinical practice. Significant improvements were found on the CGI and SCL-90- R Global Indexes scores of both treatment groups, showing clear clinical state improvement. No statistically significant differences were observed when the efficacy of VCTP treatment was compared to F2FC psychiatric treatment efficacy. This study demonstrated that telepsychiatry treatment through videoconference has equivalent efficacy to F2FC psychiatric treatment. Telepsychiatry showed to be an effective mean of delivering mental health services to psychiatric outpatients living in remote areas with limited resources.

摘要

尽管视频会议形式的远程精神病学在增加医疗服务可及性和用户满意度方面广受好评,但目前关于远程精神病学应用的治疗结果和疗效的数据却很少。本文通过与面对面传统(F2FC)治疗进行比较,评估视频会议形式的远程精神病学在治疗精神障碍方面的疗效。我们开展了一项随机临床试验,将140名精神科门诊患者随机分为F2FC治疗组或视频会议远程精神病学(VCTP)治疗组。使用复合国际诊断访谈,根据第十版国际疾病分类(ICD - 10)标准对患者进行诊断。在为期24周的研究期间,治疗包括八次每次持续30分钟的会诊。患者在会诊期间接受相关精神药物治疗以及认知行为疗法。同一位精神科医生对从加那利群岛圣塞瓦斯蒂安 - 德拉戈梅拉社区心理健康中心招募的所有患者进行诊断和治疗。精神科测试分数的变化作为主要疗效标准。通过比较基线(第1次就诊)时的临床总体印象 - 疾病严重程度(CGI - S)和 - 改善程度(CGI - I)量表以及SCL - 90R的总体指数(GSI、PSDI和PST)与研究期末(第24周)获得的分数来确定疗效。反应被定义为CGI - I评分为1或2。在SCL - 90R总体指数分数中计算可靠变化指数。在随机分组的140名患者中,130名完成了24周的治疗。VCTP组只有4名患者提前退出研究,F2FC组有6名。该研究涉及534次远程会诊、522次F2FC会诊以及超过500小时的临床实践。两个治疗组的CGI和SCL - 90 - R总体指数分数均有显著改善,显示出临床状态明显改善。当比较VCTP治疗疗效与F2FC精神科治疗疗效时,未观察到统计学上的显著差异。这项研究表明,视频会议形式的远程精神病学治疗与F2FC精神科治疗具有同等疗效。远程精神病学被证明是为生活在资源有限的偏远地区的精神科门诊患者提供心理健康服务的一种有效方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验