• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国心脏移植中心利用互联网提高患者选择过程的透明度。

Use of the internet by United States heart transplant centers to promote transparency in the process of patient selection.

作者信息

Bramstedt Katrina A, Young James B

机构信息

Department of Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2006 Jun;12(3):359-62. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.359.

DOI:10.1089/tmj.2006.12.359
PMID:16796504
Abstract

Organ transplantation is an ethically complex technology, in part because organs are very scarce and supply does not meet demand. Organ allocation must use a process that is fair, and the process should be open for public review and revision. We explored the transparency of the heart transplant patient selection process in the United States terming transparency as hospital use of their transplant program Web site to disclose their policies to potential patients. The Web sites of all heart transplant centers belonging to the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network were reviewed for content pertaining to patient selection criteria for placement on the transplant waiting list. All 132 heart transplant centers have a Web site that discusses their transplant program; however, 84% (n = 111) do not publish their medical listing criteria on their Web site. Only 15% (n = 20) expressly indicate the requirement for a psychosocial evaluation. Few centers (n = 9) utilize their Web site to discuss use of a formal data review committee to decide which patients to list for transplantation. In order to demystify and correct false assumptions about the transplant listing process, wait listing criteria should be transparent to the public and Internet disclosure can facilitate this end. Our findings lay the foundation for future prospective studies.

摘要

器官移植是一项伦理复杂的技术,部分原因在于器官非常稀缺,供不应求。器官分配必须采用公平的程序,且该程序应公开接受公众审查和修订。我们探讨了美国心脏移植患者选择过程的透明度,将透明度定义为医院利用其移植项目网站向潜在患者披露政策。对美国器官获取与移植网络所属的所有心脏移植中心的网站进行了审查,以查找与列入移植等候名单的患者选择标准相关的内容。所有132个心脏移植中心都有一个讨论其移植项目的网站;然而,84%(n = 111)的中心未在其网站上公布其医学列入标准。只有15%(n = 20)明确指出了心理社会评估的要求。很少有中心(n = 9)利用其网站讨论使用正式数据审查委员会来决定哪些患者可列入移植名单。为了消除对移植列入过程的神秘感并纠正错误假设,等候列入标准应向公众透明,而通过互联网披露有助于实现这一目标。我们的研究结果为未来的前瞻性研究奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Use of the internet by United States heart transplant centers to promote transparency in the process of patient selection.美国心脏移植中心利用互联网提高患者选择过程的透明度。
Telemed J E Health. 2006 Jun;12(3):359-62. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.359.
2
Projected survival benefit as criterion for listing and organ allocation in heart transplantation.预期生存获益作为心脏移植列入名单及器官分配的标准
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Jun;24(6):680-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.04.015.
3
How the system functions. The roles of the United Network of Organ Sharing, the organ procurement and transplantation network, and the organ procurement organization in heart transplantation.该系统如何运作。器官共享联合网络、器官获取与移植网络以及器官获取组织在心脏移植中的作用。
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2000 Mar;12(1):11-21.
4
Use of genetic risks in pediatric organ transplantation listing decisions: A national survey.儿科器官移植列入名单决策中遗传风险的应用:一项全国性调查。
Pediatr Transplant. 2019 Jun;23(4):e13402. doi: 10.1111/petr.13402. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
5
Effects of the 2006 U.S. thoracic organ allocation change: analysis of local impact on organ procurement and heart transplantation.2006 年美国胸部器官分配政策改变的影响:对器官获取和心脏移植的地方影响分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Mar;29(3):235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.05.036. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
6
Who gets a heart? Rationing and rationalizing in heart transplantation.谁能获得心脏?心脏移植中的配给与合理化
West J Med. 1997 May;166(5):326-36.
7
Outcomes with an alternate list strategy for heart transplantation.心脏移植替代名单策略的结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov;24(11):1781-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.03.014. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
8
A review of public policies to procure and distribute kidneys for transplantation.关于获取和分配用于移植的肾脏的公共政策综述。
Arch Intern Med. 1990 Mar;150(3):523-7.
9
Who gets a lung transplant? Assessing the psychosocial decision-making process for transplant listing.谁会接受肺移植?评估移植入列的社会心理决策过程。
Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2016 Sep 30;2016(3):e201626. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2016.26.
10
Risk factors for mortality or delisting of patients from the pediatric heart transplant waiting list.导致儿科心脏移植候补患者死亡或被取消候补资格的风险因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of In-Home Internet Use Among Prekidney and Postkidney Transplant Patients-Facilitators and Barriers to Use and Trends Over Time.肾移植术前和术后患者家庭互联网使用频率——使用的促进因素和障碍以及随时间的趋势
Transplant Direct. 2017 Oct 2;3(11):e216. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000735. eCollection 2017 Nov.
2
A web-based tool for designing vaccine formularies for childhood immunization in the United States.一个用于设计美国儿童免疫疫苗配方的基于网络的工具。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):611-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2636. Epub 2008 Jun 25.