Zhang Dong-mei, Zhang Gui-ying, Wang Tao, Zhong Hui-ju, Chen Wen-ke
Department of Gastrointestinal, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 May 16;86(18):1279-83.
To investigate the therapeutic effects of insulin-sensitizing drugs, rosiglitazone and metformin, on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
Forty-four male SD rats were randomized into 4 groups: normal control group (n = 8, fed with normal food) and NAFLD rats (n = 36, fed with high-fat food). Eight weeks later 4 rats were randomly selected from the NAFLD group and were killed to undergo pathological examination of the liver. When the establishment of experimental model of NAFLD rats was confirmed the remaining 32 NAFLD rats were subdivided into 4 equal subgroups: NAFLD control group (to be fed continuously with high-fat food), rosiglitazone treatment group (fed with normal food and rosiglitazone 1.5 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) by gastric perfusion), metformin treatment group (fed with normal food and metformin 150 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) by gastric perfusion), and dietary treatment group (fed with normal food and normal saline by gastric perfusion). By the end of the 12th week, all rats were killed to isolate the samples of serum to test the levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Samples of liver tissue were taken to undergo pathology to examine fatty degeneration and inflammatory cell infiltration and detection of the levels of TC and TG. In the liver the weights of body and liver were measured so as to calculate the liver index.
(1) The levels of serum TC, TG, ALT, and AST, liver TC and TG, and liver index of the NAFLD control group increased significantly, and the liver histology of the NAFLD control group expressed moderate to severe fatty degeneration. (2) The serum TC levels of the rosiglitazone and metformin groups were 2.49 mmol/L +/- 0.68 mmol/L and 2.49 mmol/L +/- 0.58 mmol/L, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD control group (4.55 mmol/L +/- 1.58 mmol/L, both P < 0.001). The serum TG levels of the rosiglitazone and metformin groups were 0.61 mmol/L +/- 0.17 mmol/L and 0.63 mmol/L +/- 0.16 mmol/L respectively, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD control group (0.85 mmol/L +/- 0.15 mmol/L, both P < 0.001). The serum level of ALT of the rosiglitazone and metformin groups were 38.3 U/L +/- 10.6 U/L and 43.3 U/L +/- 27.5 U/L respectively, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD control group (110.6 U/L +/- 44.2 U/L, P < 0.001 and P < 0.05). The serum levels of AST of the rosiglitazone and metformin groups were 141.7 U/L +/- 14.3 U/L and 174.5 U/L +/- 57.9 U/L, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD control group (251.8 U/L +/- 91.0 U/L, both P < 0.05). The liver TG levels of the rosiglitazone and metformin groups were 18.9 mg/g +/- 2.7 mg/g and 20.4 mg/g +/- 3.6 mg/g respectively, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD control group (54.8 mg/g +/- 7.6 mg/g, both P < 0.05). The fatty degeneration grades of liver tissues of the rosiglitazone and metformin groups were grade: 0.8 +/- 0.3 and 1.0 +/- 0.2, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD control group (grade 2.8 +/- 0.5, both P < 0.05). The hepatic inflammation scores of: the rosiglitazone and metformin groups were 0.8 +/- 0.2 and 1.0 +/- 0.3 respectively, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD control group (1.8 +/- 0.4, both P < 0.05). The levels of abnormality in serum TC and TG, liver TG, and liver histology of the dietary treatment group were all alleviated in comparison with the NAFLD control group, but were somewhat severer than those of the rosiglitazone and metformin treatment groups. (3) The serum TNF-alpha levels of the rosiglitazone and metformin treatment groups were 124.6 pg/mL +/- 21.0 pg/mL, 154.9 pg/mL +/- 32.5 pg/mL respectively, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD group (324.2 pg/mL +/- 34.2 pg/mL, P < 0.001 and P < 0.05). The liver TNF-alpha levels of the rosiglitazone and metformin treatment groups were 0.24 +/- 0.14 and 0.30 +/- 0.12 respectively, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD group (0.85 +/- 0.12, both P < 0.001). The levels of FAS mRNA expression of the rosiglitazone and metformin treatment groups were 0.22 +/- 0.14 and 0.29 +/- 0.16 respectively, both significantly lower than that of the NAFLD group (0.68 +/- 0.23, P < 0.001 and P < 0.005).
The insulin-sensitizing drugs, rosiglitazone and metformin, are effective in the treatment of NAFLD.
探讨胰岛素增敏剂罗格列酮和二甲双胍对非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的治疗作用。
44只雄性SD大鼠随机分为4组:正常对照组(n = 8,喂以正常食物)和NAFLD大鼠组(n = 36,喂以高脂食物)。8周后,从NAFLD组中随机选取4只大鼠处死,进行肝脏病理检查。当NAFLD大鼠实验模型建立确认后,将其余32只NAFLD大鼠再平均分为4个亚组:NAFLD对照组(继续喂以高脂食物)、罗格列酮治疗组(喂以正常食物并经胃灌注罗格列酮1.5 mg·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹)、二甲双胍治疗组(喂以正常食物并经胃灌注二甲双胍150 mg·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹)和饮食治疗组(喂以正常食物并经胃灌注生理盐水)。至第12周结束时,处死所有大鼠,分离血清样本检测总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平。取肝脏组织样本进行病理检查,观察脂肪变性和炎症细胞浸润情况,并检测TC和TG水平。测量肝脏和体质量,计算肝脏指数。
(1)NAFLD对照组血清TC、TG、ALT和AST水平、肝脏TC和TG水平以及肝脏指数均显著升高,NAFLD对照组肝脏组织学表现为中度至重度脂肪变性。(2)罗格列酮组和二甲双胍组血清TC水平分别为2.49 mmol/L±0.68 mmol/L和2.49 mmol/L±0.58 mmol/L,均显著低于NAFLD对照组(4.55 mmol/L±1.58 mmol/L,P均<0.001)。罗格列酮组和二甲双胍组血清TG水平分别为0.61 mmol/L±0.17 mmol/L和0.63 mmol/L±0.16 mmol/L,均显著低于NAFLD对照组(0.85 mmol/L±0.15 mmol/L,P均<0.001)。罗格列酮组和二甲双胍组血清ALT水平分别为38.3 U/L±10.6 U/L和43.3 U/L±27.5 U/L,均显著低于NAFLD对照组(110.6 U/L±44.2 U/L,P<0.001和P<0.05)。罗格列酮组和二甲双胍组血清AST水平分别为141.7 U/L±14.3 U/L和174.5 U/L±57.9 U/L,均显著低于NAFLD对照组(251.8 U/L±91.0 U/L,P均<0.05)。罗格列酮组和二甲双胍组肝脏TG水平分别为18.9 mg/g±2.7 mg/g和20.4 mg/g±3.6 mg/g,均显著低于NAFLD对照组(54.8 mg/g±7.6 mg/g,P均<0.05)。罗格列酮组和二甲双胍组肝脏组织脂肪变性分级分别为0.8±0.3级和1.0±0.2级,均显著低于NAFLD对照组(2.8±0.5级,P均<0.05)。罗格列酮组和二甲双胍组肝脏炎症评分分别为0.8±0.2分和1.0±0.3分,均显著低于NAFLD对照组(1.8±0.4分,P均<0.05)。饮食治疗组血清TC和TG异常水平、肝脏TG水平及肝脏组织学改变与NAFLD对照组相比均有改善,但较罗格列酮组和二甲双胍组稍重。(3)罗格列酮治疗组和二甲双胍治疗组血清TNF-α水平分别为124.6 pg/mL±21.0 pg/mL、154.9 pg/mL±32.5 pg/mL,均显著低于NAFLD组(324.2 pg/mL±34.2 pg/mL,P<0.001和P<0.05)。罗格列酮治疗组和二甲双胍治疗组肝脏TNF-α水平分别为0.24±0.14和0.30±0.12,均显著低于NAFLD组(0.85±0.12,P均<0.