Suppr超能文献

一种用于评估医生对具备决策支持功能的手持计算机态度的量表的开发与测试。

Development and testing of a scale to assess physician attitudes about handheld computers with decision support.

作者信息

Ray Midge N, Houston Thomas K, Yu Feliciano B, Menachemi Nir, Maisiak Richard S, Allison Jeroan J, Berner Eta S

机构信息

Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-3361, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):567-72. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2096. Epub 2006 Jun 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors developed and evaluated a rating scale, the Attitudes toward Handheld Decision Support Software Scale (H-DSS), to assess physician attitudes about handheld decision support systems.

DESIGN

The authors conducted a prospective assessment of psychometric characteristics of the H-DSS including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Participants were 82 Internal Medicine residents. A higher score on each of the 14 five-point Likert scale items reflected a more positive attitude about handheld DSS. The H-DSS score is the mean across the fourteen items. Attitudes toward the use of the handheld DSS were assessed prior to and six months after receiving the handheld device.

STATISTICS

Cronbach's Alpha was used to assess internal consistency reliability. Pearson correlations were used to estimate and detect significant associations between scale scores and other measures (validity). Paired sample t-tests were used to test for changes in the mean attitude scale score (responsiveness) and for differences between groups.

RESULTS

Internal consistency reliability for the scale was alpha = 0.73. In testing validity, moderate correlations were noted between the attitude scale scores and self-reported Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) usage in the hospital (correlation coefficient = 0.55) and clinic (0.48), p < 0.05 for both. The scale was responsive, in that it detected the expected increase in scores between the two administrations (3.99 (s.d. = 0.35) vs. 4.08, (s.d. = 0.34), p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The authors' evaluation showed that the H-DSS scale was reliable, valid, and responsive. The scale can be used to guide future handheld DSS development and implementation.

摘要

目的

作者开发并评估了一种评分量表,即手持式决策支持软件态度量表(H-DSS),以评估医生对手持式决策支持系统的态度。

设计

作者对手持式决策支持系统(H-DSS)的心理测量特征进行了前瞻性评估,包括信度、效度和反应度。参与者为82名内科住院医师。14个五点李克特量表项目中,每个项目得分越高,表明对手持式决策支持系统的态度越积极。H-DSS得分是14个项目得分的平均值。在接收手持设备之前和之后六个月评估对手持式决策支持系统使用的态度。

统计分析

使用Cronbach's Alpha评估内部一致性信度。使用Pearson相关性来估计和检测量表得分与其他测量指标之间的显著关联(效度)。使用配对样本t检验来检验平均态度量表得分的变化(反应度)以及组间差异。

结果

该量表的内部一致性信度为alpha = 0.73。在效度测试中,态度量表得分与医院自我报告的个人数字助理(PDA)使用情况(相关系数 = 0.55)和诊所使用情况(0.48)之间存在中等相关性,两者p均 < 0.05。该量表具有反应度,因为它检测到两次测量之间得分的预期增加(3.99(标准差 = 0.35)对4.08,(标准差 = 0.34),p < 0.005)。

结论

作者的评估表明,H-DSS量表可靠、有效且具有反应度。该量表可用于指导未来手持式决策支持系统的开发和实施。

相似文献

1
Development and testing of a scale to assess physician attitudes about handheld computers with decision support.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):567-72. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2096. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
4
8
Reliability and validity of Turkish version of attitudes toward old people scale.
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Nov;20(21-22):3196-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03764.x. Epub 2011 Apr 25.
10
Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study.
BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1162.

引用本文的文献

1
Celebrating Eta Berner and her influence on biomedical and health informatics.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):549-551. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae011.
2
Planning for Hospital IT Implementation: A New Look at the Business Case.
Biomed Inform Insights. 2008 Nov 28;1:29-44. doi: 10.4137/bii.s1035. eCollection 2008.
3
An assessment of Health Care Information and Management Systems Society and Leapfrog data on computerized provider order entry.
Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1575-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01259.x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving ambulatory prescribing safety with a handheld decision support system: a randomized controlled trial.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):171-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1961. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
3
US graduate medical education, 2003-2004.
JAMA. 2004 Sep 1;292(9):1032-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.9.1032.
4
Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study.
BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1162.
5
Assessing medical residents' usage and perceived needs for personal digital assistants.
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Feb;73(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.12.005.
6
Pediatricians' use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants.
Pediatrics. 2004 Feb;113(2):238-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.2.238.
9
Survey assessment of personal digital assistant use among trainees and attending physicians.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):605-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1313. Epub 2003 Aug 4.
10
Handheld computing in medicine.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):139-49. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1180.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验