Berner Eta S, Houston Thomas K, Ray Midge N, Allison Jeroan J, Heudebert Gustavo R, Chatham W Winn, Kennedy John I, Glandon Gerald L, Norton Patricia A, Crawford Myra A, Maisiak Richard S
Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1675 University Boulevard, Room 544, Birmingham, AL 35294-3361, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):171-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1961. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescribing safety in the outpatient setting.
The design was a randomized, controlled trial conducted in a university-based resident clinic. Internal medicine residents received a PDA-based CDSS suite. For intervention residents, the CDSS included a prediction rule for NSAID-related gastrointestinal risk assessment and treatment recommendations. Unannounced standardized patients (SPs) trained to portray musculoskeletal symptoms presented to study physicians. Safety outcomes were assessed from the prescriptions given to the SPs. Each prescription was reviewed by a committee of clinicians blinded to participant, intervention group assignment, and baseline or follow-up status.
Prescriptions were judged as safe or unsafe. The main outcome measure was the differential change in unsafe prescribing of NSAIDs for the intervention versus the control group.
At baseline, the mean proportion of cases per physician with unsafe prescriptions for the two groups was similar (0.27 vs. 0.29, p > 0.05). Controlling for baseline performance, intervention participants prescribed more safely than controls after receiving the CDSS (0.23 vs. 0.45 [F = 4.24, p < 0.05]). With the CDSS, intervention participants documented more complete assessment of patient gastrointestinal risk from NSAIDs.
PARTICIPANTS provided with a PDA-based CDSS for NSAID prescribing made fewer unsafe treatment decisions than participants without the CDSS.
评估基于个人数字助理(PDA)的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)在门诊环境中对非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)处方安全性的有效性。
该设计为在一所大学附属住院诊所进行的随机对照试验。内科住院医师使用基于PDA的CDSS套件。对于干预组住院医师,CDSS包括一个用于NSAID相关胃肠道风险评估的预测规则和治疗建议。经过培训以表现肌肉骨骼症状的未宣布的标准化患者(SP)向研究医生求诊。根据给SP开出的处方评估安全结果。每张处方由一个对参与者、干预组分配以及基线或随访状态不知情的临床医生委员会进行审查。
处方被判定为安全或不安全。主要结局指标是干预组与对照组NSAID不安全处方的差异变化。
在基线时,两组中每位医生开具不安全处方的病例平均比例相似(0.27对0.29,p>0.05)。在控制基线表现后,干预组参与者在接受CDSS后比对照组开具的处方更安全(0.23对0.45 [F = 4.24,p < 0.05])。使用CDSS时,干预组参与者对患者NSAID胃肠道风险的评估记录更完整。
与没有CDSS的参与者相比,配备基于PDA的NSAID处方CDSS的参与者做出的不安全治疗决策更少。