Iwai Sei, Cantillon Daniel J, Kim Robert J, Markowitz Steven M, Mittal Suneet, Stein Kenneth M, Shah Bindi K, Yarlagadda Ravi K, Cheung Jim W, Tan Vivian R, Lerman Bruce B
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Oct;17(10):1052-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00539.x. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
"Idiopathic" ventricular arrhythmias most often arise from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), although arrhythmias from the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) are also observed. While previous work has elucidated the mechanism and electropharmacologic profile of RVOT arrhythmias, it is unclear whether those from the LVOT share these properties. The purpose of this study was to characterize the electropharmacologic properties of RVOT and LVOT arrhythmias.
One hundred twenty-two consecutive patients (61 male; 50.9 +/- 15.2 years) with outflow tract arrhythmias comprise this series, 100 (82%) with an RVOT origin, and 22 (18%) with an LVOT origin. The index arrhythmia was similar: sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (RVOT = 28%, LVOT = 36%), nonsustained VT (RVOT = 40%, LVOT = 23%), and premature ventricular complexes (RVOT = 32%, LVOT = 41%) (P = 0.32). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and microvolt T-wave alternans results (normal/indeterminate) were also comparable. In addition, 41% with RVOT foci and 50% with LVOT foci were inducible for sustained VT (P = 0.48), and induction of VT was catecholamine dependent in a majority of patients in both groups (66% and 73%; RVOT and LVOT, respectively; P = 1.0). VT was sensitive to adenosine (88% and 78% in the RVOT and LVOT groups, respectively, P = 0.59) as well as blockade of the slow-inward calcium current (RVOT = 70%, LVOT = 80%; P = 1.00) in both groups.
Electrophysiologic and pharmacologic properties, including sensitivity to adenosine, are similar for RVOT and LVOT arrhythmias. Despite disparate sites of origin, these data suggest a common arrhythmogenic mechanism, consistent with cyclic AMP-mediated triggered activity. Based on these similarities, these arrhythmias should be considered as a single entity, and classified together as "outflow tract arrhythmias."
“特发性”室性心律失常最常起源于右心室流出道(RVOT),不过也观察到有起源于左心室流出道(LVOT)的心律失常。虽然此前的研究已阐明RVOT心律失常的机制和电药理学特征,但尚不清楚LVOT心律失常是否具有这些特性。本研究的目的是描述RVOT和LVOT心律失常的电药理学特性。
本系列研究纳入了122例连续的流出道心律失常患者(61例男性;年龄50.9±15.2岁),其中100例(82%)起源于RVOT,22例(18%)起源于LVOT。索引心律失常相似:持续性室性心动过速(VT)(RVOT组为28%,LVOT组为36%)、非持续性VT(RVOT组为40%,LVOT组为23%)和室性早搏(RVOT组为32%,LVOT组为41%)(P = 0.32)。心脏磁共振成像和微伏T波交替结果(正常/不确定)也具有可比性。此外,RVOT起源灶患者中有41%、LVOT起源灶患者中有50%可诱发持续性VT(P = 0.48),两组中大多数患者VT的诱发依赖儿茶酚胺(分别为66%和73%;RVOT组和LVOT组;P = 1.0)。两组中VT对腺苷均敏感(RVOT组和LVOT组分别为88%和78%,P = 0.59),对慢内向钙电流阻断也敏感(RVOT组为70%,LVOT组为80%;P = 1.00)。
RVOT和LVOT心律失常的电生理和药理学特性,包括对腺苷的敏感性,是相似的。尽管起源部位不同,但这些数据提示存在共同的致心律失常机制,符合环磷酸腺苷介导的触发活动。基于这些相似性,这些心律失常应被视为一个单一实体,并归类为“流出道心律失常”。