McCarthy Christopher J, Rushton Alison, Billis Vicky, Arnall Frances, Oldham Jacqueline A
Centre for Rehabilitation Science, University of Manchester, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
J Rehabil Med. 2006 Jul;38(4):263-7. doi: 10.1080/16501970600632768.
To establish the discriminatory items of the clinical examination of non-specific low back pain, important to physiotherapists.
A focus group and Delphi technique with UK physiotherapists.
A purposive sample of 30 physiotherapists attended a focus group and completed 3 rounds of Delphi questionnaires.
Data were analysed using mixed qualitative and quantitative approaches. A frequency content analysis identified commonly identified tests and questions, whilst the Delphi consensus technique assumed consensus had been reached with greater than 80% agreement on item inclusion or exclusion.
The focus group established the structure of the clinical examination with 15 domains of questioning or physical testing. Three rounds of Delphi questionnaires established the important items of the clinical examination. The list of tests and questions included items evaluating both the psychosocial and biomedical status of the patient as well as questions screening for red flags.
This is the first work to establish discriminatory tests in the clinical examination of non-specific low back pain, important to physiotherapists. The clinical examination will subsequently be evaluated for item validity and data will undergo cluster analysis. The items of this clinical examination may provide evidence for the existence of homogenous sub-groups within the heterogeneous non-specific low back pain diagnosis.
确定对物理治疗师而言非特异性下腰痛临床检查中的鉴别项目。
对英国物理治疗师开展焦点小组和德尔菲技术研究。
30名物理治疗师的目的抽样样本参加了焦点小组并完成了三轮德尔菲问卷调查。
采用定性和定量相结合的方法分析数据。频率内容分析确定了常见的检查和问题,而德尔菲共识技术假定在项目纳入或排除方面达成共识的比例超过80%。
焦点小组确定了临床检查的结构,包括15个询问或体格检查领域。三轮德尔菲问卷调查确定了临床检查的重要项目。检查和问题清单包括评估患者心理社会和生物医学状况的项目以及筛查警示信号的问题。
这是首次在非特异性下腰痛临床检查中确定鉴别检查,对物理治疗师具有重要意义。随后将对临床检查进行项目效度评估,数据将进行聚类分析。该临床检查项目可能为非特异性下腰痛异质性诊断中存在同质子组提供证据。