Kirking D M, Bickley S K, Wasserman M L
College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1065.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991 Aug;48(8):1722-7.
Physicians' knowledge of dosage and cost differences between injectable and oral histamine H2-receptor antagonists (HRAs) and attitudes toward pharmacist-initiated route conversion of HRAs were assessed. A questionnaire was mailed to 491 physicians two months before implementation of a hospital program that allowed pharmacists to use preapproved guidelines to directly change the route of HRA administration. A similar questionnaire was sent to 488 physicians after five months of program operation. The response rate was 36.0% and 37.5% for the first and second surveys, respectively. In both surveys, almost half of the respondents gave incorrect answers or did not know whether dosage should be altered when HRA route is changed, and about 60% underestimated the relative cost of injectable HRAs. Among respondents who were aware of the program, 28% preferred direct pharmacist intervention; 15% of respondents who were unaware of the program had the same preference. Physicians generally responded positively to statements regarding the acceptability of the program and thought that the pharmacist's role in route conversion was appropriate. Many physicians were ignorant of differences in dosage and cost between injectable and oral HRAs. They generally supported allowing pharmacists to change the route of HRA administration from injectable to oral.
评估了医生对注射用和口服组胺H2受体拮抗剂(HRAs)之间剂量和成本差异的了解,以及他们对药剂师发起的HRAs给药途径转换的态度。在一项医院计划实施前两个月,向491名医生邮寄了一份调查问卷,该计划允许药剂师使用预先批准的指南直接改变HRA的给药途径。在该计划运行五个月后,向488名医生发送了一份类似的调查问卷。第一次和第二次调查的回复率分别为36.0%和37.5%。在两项调查中,几乎一半的受访者给出了错误答案,或者不知道当HRA给药途径改变时剂量是否应该改变,并且约60%的人低估了注射用HRAs的相对成本。在知晓该计划的受访者中,28%倾向于药剂师直接干预;在不知晓该计划的受访者中,15%有同样的倾向。医生们对有关该计划可接受性的陈述总体反应积极,并认为药剂师在给药途径转换中的作用是恰当的。许多医生对注射用和口服HRAs之间的剂量和成本差异并不了解。他们总体上支持允许药剂师将HRA的给药途径从注射改为口服。