Suppr超能文献

两种β2-拟交感神经药在不同吸入器中治疗儿童哮喘的临床疗效。呼吸驱动吸入器中的吡布特罗与传统定量吸入器中的沙丁胺醇的比较。

Clinical efficacy of two beta 2-sympathicomimetics in different inhalers in children with asthma. Comparison of pirbuterol in a breath-actuated inhaler and salbutamol in a customary metered-dose inhaler.

作者信息

Völkl K P, Kroll V M, Wiesemann H G, Schneider B

机构信息

3M Medica GmbH, Borken/Westf, Fed. Rep. of Germany.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1991 May;41(5):533-6.

PMID:1680327
Abstract

In a controlled clinical crossover trial, the therapeutic effect of pirbuterol (CAS 38677-81-5) in the Autohaler was compared to that of salbutamol in a customary metered-dose aerosol in 17 children with asthma. Each child was randomized to both treatments with a washout period of at least 1 day and at most 13 days. Ten children commenced with salbutamol and then switched over to pirbuterol, and the other 7 vice versa. The main criterion to evaluate efficacy was the forced expiratory volume after 1 s (FEV1). Other efficacy criteria were forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow (PEF). The patients were given detailed instructions on how to use the inhalers. Each treatment was applied in the morning with one shot (0.2 mg pirbuterol or 0.1 mg salbutamol). FEV1, FVC and PEF were measured in all patients 10 min before and 10 min after medication with the whole-body plethysmograph; further measurements were carried out in most patients 60 and 240 min after application. There was a mean increase of 47% in the FEV1 compared to baseline with pirbuterol in the Autohaler compared to a mean increase of only 30% with salbutamol in the customary metered-dose inhaler. The difference is statistically significant (p = 0.036). A linear crossover analysis showed a significant treatment effect 10 min after application in favour of pirbuterol with no significant period effects or interactions (p = 0.020). The increases of FVC and PEF after pirbuterol treatment were also remarkably higher than after salbutamol. No side effects were observed.

摘要

在一项对照临床交叉试验中,将17名哮喘儿童使用喘速宁(CAS 38677-81-5)自动吸入器的治疗效果与沙丁胺醇在传统定量气雾剂中的治疗效果进行了比较。每个孩子都被随机分配接受两种治疗,洗脱期至少为1天,最长为13天。10名儿童先使用沙丁胺醇,然后改用喘速宁,另外7名儿童则相反。评估疗效的主要标准是1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。其他疗效标准是用力肺活量(FVC)和呼气峰值流速(PEF)。向患者详细说明了如何使用吸入器。每种治疗均在早晨使用一次(0.2毫克喘速宁或0.1毫克沙丁胺醇)。使用全身体积描记器在用药前10分钟和用药后10分钟测量所有患者的FEV1、FVC和PEF;大多数患者在用药后60分钟和240分钟进行了进一步测量。与使用传统定量吸入器的沙丁胺醇相比,使用喘速宁自动吸入器的患者FEV1较基线平均增加了47%,而使用沙丁胺醇的患者平均仅增加了30%。差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.036)。线性交叉分析显示,用药后10分钟有显著的治疗效果,有利于喘速宁,且无显著的周期效应或相互作用(p = 0.020)。喘速宁治疗后FVC和PEF的增加也明显高于沙丁胺醇治疗后。未观察到副作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验