Henry Agnes, Charpiat Bruno, Perol Maurice, Vial Thierry, de Saint Hilaire Pierre Jousselin, Descotes Jacques
Pharmacy Department, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon, France.
Cancer J. 2006 May-Jun;12(3):237-45. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200605000-00013.
Several studies have suggested the usefulness of a test dose of paclitaxel to reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions and the resulting cost of drug wastage. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of implementing such a test dose.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients who had received one or two courses of single-agent paclitaxel or a combination chemotherapy regimen to calculate hypersensitivity reaction incidence and the cost of drug wastage. Thereafter, a paclitaxel test-dose program was routinely implemented during the first and second cycles of paclitaxel treatment for all patients. Hypersensitivity reaction incidence and drug wastage cost were again assessed.
Before the routine use of a test dose, 162 patients received one or two paclitaxel infusions alone or in combination therapy from January 1, 1997 to February 28, 2003. Ten (6.2%) patients experienced a hypersensitivity reaction; one of them was severe. After implementation of the test-dose program, 130 patients received 244 test doses (12 mg paclitaxel/10 mL normal saline) with an intensified premedication regimen at the first and second cycles of chemotherapy from June 28, 2003 to March 2, 2005. Three patients (2.3%) experienced a minor hypersensitivity reaction, one immediately after the test dose and two during infusion of the full dose despite a well-tolerated test dose. Thus, the negative predictive value of the test dose was 98.4%. The overall incidence of hypersensitivity reactions experienced during the first or second cycle of paclitaxel chemotherapy decreased about 63% compared with the incidence before implementation of the test dose (P < 0.20). The test-dose program resulted in a 29% increase in the cost of chemotherapy (approximately 6100 dollars for 130 patients).
To our knowledge, this is the largest study ever reported to test the potential cost-saving benefit of the implementation of a paclitaxel test-dose program to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. The results suggest that the routine use of a test dose is not a cost-effective measure.
多项研究表明,紫杉醇试验剂量有助于降低过敏反应发生率及由此产生的药物浪费成本。本研究旨在评估实施该试验剂量的效用。
我们回顾性查阅了接受一或两个疗程单药紫杉醇或联合化疗方案的患者病历,以计算过敏反应发生率及药物浪费成本。此后,在所有患者紫杉醇治疗的第一和第二周期常规实施紫杉醇试验剂量方案。再次评估过敏反应发生率及药物浪费成本。
在常规使用试验剂量之前,1997年1月1日至2003年2月28日期间,162例患者单独或联合接受了一或两次紫杉醇输注。10例(6.2%)患者发生过敏反应,其中1例严重。实施试验剂量方案后,2003年6月28日至2005年3月2日期间,130例患者在化疗的第一和第二周期接受了244次试验剂量(12mg紫杉醇/10mL生理盐水),并采用强化预处理方案。3例患者(2.3%)发生轻微过敏反应,1例在试验剂量后立即发生,2例在全剂量输注期间发生,尽管试验剂量耐受性良好。因此,试验剂量的阴性预测值为98.4%。与试验剂量实施前的发生率相比,紫杉醇化疗第一或第二周期发生的过敏反应总体发生率降低了约63%(P<0.20)。试验剂量方案使化疗成本增加了29%(130例患者约6100美元)。
据我们所知,这是有史以来最大规模的一项研究,旨在测试实施紫杉醇试验剂量方案预防过敏反应的潜在成本节约效益。结果表明,常规使用试验剂量并非具有成本效益的措施。