Feng Bo, Zheng Min-Hua, Mao Zhi-Hai, Li Jian-Wen, Lu Ai-Guo, Wang Ming-Liang, Hu Wei-Guo, Dong Feng, Hu Yan-Yan, Zang Lu, Li Hong-Wei
Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, 200025 Shanghai, China.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006 Jun;18(3):191-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03324648.
Elderly patients have a high incidence of colorectal cancer, which may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to complex comorbidity and diminished cardiopulmonary reserves. The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery with those observed in traditional open surgery in patients aged over 70 years.
Between January 2003 and October 2004, 51 patients aged over 70 years with colorectal cancer, who underwent laparoscopic surgery (LAP group), were evaluated and compared with 102 controls (also over 70 years old) treated by traditional open surgery (OPEN group) in the same period. All patients were evaluated with respect to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, surgery-related complications, and postoperative recovery.
No surgery-related death was observed in the LAP group, whereas two deaths occurred in the OPEN group for severe post-operative pulmonary infection and anastomotic leak, respectively. No pneumoperitoneum-related complications were observed in the LAP group; 2 (3.9%) patients required conversion to open surgery, because of the unexpectedly bulky tumor and severe adhesions in the abdominal cavity. With the increase in patients' age, increased ASA classification was observed. No significant differences were observed in gender, Dukes' staging or types of procedures between LAP and OPEN groups. The overall morbidity in the LAP group was significantly less than that of the OPEN group [17.6% (9/51) vs 37.3% (38/102), p=0.013]. Mean blood loss, time to flatus passage, and time to semi-liquid diet in the LAP group were significantly shorter than those of the OPEN group (90.7+/-49.9 vs 150.3+/-108.7 ml, 2.4+/-1.2 vs 3.5+/-2.9 d, 5.0+/-1.8 vs 5.9+/-1.2 d, respectively, p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in terms of mean operation time or hospital stay between LAP and OPEN groups.
Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer has clinically significant advantages over traditional open surgery, and appears to be the ideal surgical choice for the elderly.
老年患者结直肠癌发病率较高,这可能因合并症复杂及心肺储备功能下降而导致发病率和死亡率增加。本研究旨在比较70岁以上患者腹腔镜结直肠癌手术与传统开放手术的治疗效果。
2003年1月至2004年10月,对51例70岁以上接受腹腔镜手术的结直肠癌患者(腹腔镜组)进行评估,并与同期102例接受传统开放手术的对照患者(开放组,年龄也在70岁以上)进行比较。所有患者均根据美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、手术相关并发症及术后恢复情况进行评估。
腹腔镜组未观察到手术相关死亡,而开放组分别有2例患者因严重术后肺部感染和吻合口漏死亡。腹腔镜组未观察到气腹相关并发症;2例(3.9%)患者因肿瘤意外巨大及腹腔严重粘连而需转为开放手术。随着患者年龄增加,ASA分级升高。腹腔镜组和开放组在性别、Dukes分期或手术类型方面无显著差异。腹腔镜组的总体发病率显著低于开放组[17.6%(9/51)对37.3%(38/102),p = 0.013]。腹腔镜组的平均失血量、排气时间和半流质饮食时间均显著短于开放组(分别为90.7±49.9对150.3±108.7 ml,2.4±1.2对3.5±2.9天,5.0±1.8对5.9±1.2天,p < 0.05)。腹腔镜组和开放组在平均手术时间或住院时间方面无显著差异。
老年结肠癌患者的腹腔镜结直肠癌手术相对于传统开放手术具有临床显著优势,似乎是老年患者的理想手术选择。