Cannon Barbara, Shabalina Irina G, Kramarova Tatiana V, Petrovic Natasa, Nedergaard Jan
The Wenner-Gren Institute, The Arrhenius Laboratories F3, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 May-Jun;1757(5-6):449-58. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.05.016. Epub 2006 May 17.
A physiological function of the original uncoupling protein, UCP1, is well established: UCP1 is the molecular background for nonshivering thermogenesis. The functions of the "novel" UCPs, UCP2 and UCP3, are still not established. Recent discussions imply that all UCPs may play a role in protection against reactive oxygen species (ROS). Here we examine critically the evidence that UCP1, UCP2 and UCP3 are stimulated by ROS (superoxide) or ROS products (4-hydroxy-2-nonenal), and that the UCPs actually diminish oxidative damage. We conclude that, concerning UCP1, it is unlikely that it has such a role; concerning UCP2/UCP3, most evidence for physiologically significant roles in this respect is still circumstantial.
最初的解偶联蛋白UCP1的生理功能已得到充分证实:UCP1是非颤抖性产热的分子基础。“新型”解偶联蛋白UCP2和UCP3的功能仍未明确。最近的讨论表明,所有解偶联蛋白可能在抵御活性氧(ROS)方面发挥作用。在此,我们严格审视了UCP1、UCP2和UCP3受ROS(超氧化物)或ROS产物(4-羟基-2-壬烯醛)刺激以及这些解偶联蛋白实际上减少氧化损伤的证据。我们得出结论,就UCP1而言,它不太可能具有这样的作用;就UCP2/UCP3而言,在这方面具有生理显著作用的大多数证据仍然是间接的。