Laland Kevin N, Janik Vincent M
Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Queen's Terrace, St. Andrews, Fife, UK.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Oct;21(10):542-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
Recent interest in animal cultures has been fuelled by high-profile reports of intra- and interpopulation differences in the behavioural repertoires of primates and cetaceans, consistent with the existence of socially learned traditions. Several studies have mapped spatial differences in behaviour, revealing a mosaic of behavioural phenotypes within species. The dominant current approach attempts to determine whether this is cultural variation by excluding asocial learning, ecological or genetic factors. However, claims of animal cultures remain controversial because such comparisons are subject to weaknesses; thus, new approaches to isolating the influence of culture on behaviour are required. Here we suggest that, rather than attributing behaviour to explanatory categories, researchers would often be better advised to partition variance in behaviour to alternative sources.
近期,灵长类动物和鲸类动物行为库中种群内和种群间差异的备受瞩目的报道激发了人们对动物文化的兴趣,这与社会学习传统的存在相一致。多项研究绘制了行为的空间差异,揭示了物种内部行为表型的镶嵌图。当前的主流方法试图通过排除非社会学习、生态或遗传因素来确定这是否为文化变异。然而,动物文化的说法仍存在争议,因为此类比较存在缺陷;因此,需要新的方法来分离文化对行为的影响。在这里,我们建议,研究人员与其将行为归因于解释类别,不如常常更好地将行为差异划分为其他来源。