• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征的递减模式与重症肌无力不同。

Decrement pattern in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome is different from myasthenia gravis.

作者信息

Baslo M Baris, Deymeer Feza, Serdaroglu Piraye, Parman Yesim, Ozdemir Coskun, Cuttini Marina

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34390 Capa, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Neuromuscul Disord. 2006 Jul;16(7):454-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.nmd.2006.05.009
PMID:16806929
Abstract

The decrement pattern at low rates of repetitive nerve stimulation in myasthenia gravis (MG) is characterized by a decrease of compound muscle action potential size within the first 4-5 responses. With subsequent stimuli, compound muscle action potential size either increases or does not change. Following an observation that the pattern of decrement might be different in patients with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), we retrospectively studied traces from eight LEMS patients and 14 patients with seropositive generalized MG, calculating decrement percent from first to fourth and from first to ninth compound muscle action potential. In the LEMS patients, compound muscle action potential amplitude decreased progressively from first to ninth stimulus at 2, 3 or 5Hz in all traces but one. In contrast, MG patients demonstrated the expected improvement after the initial decrement in all traces except one. In the evaluation of patients suspected of having myasthenia gravis, the finding of progressive decrement pattern at low rates of repetitive nerve stimulation may alert the electromyographer to the possibility of Lambert-Eaton syndrome and prompt the performance of further electrodiagnostic tests.

摘要

重症肌无力(MG)患者在低频重复神经刺激时的递减模式特点是,在前4 - 5次反应中复合肌肉动作电位大小会降低。随后的刺激中,复合肌肉动作电位大小要么增加,要么不变。在观察到兰伯特 - 伊顿肌无力综合征(LEMS)患者的递减模式可能有所不同后,我们回顾性研究了8例LEMS患者和14例血清学阳性的全身型MG患者的记录,计算从第一次到第四次以及从第一次到第九次复合肌肉动作电位的递减百分比。在LEMS患者中,除一条记录外,所有记录在2、3或5Hz频率下,复合肌肉动作电位幅度从第一次刺激到第九次刺激均逐渐降低。相比之下,MG患者除一条记录外,所有记录在最初递减后均出现预期的改善。在评估疑似重症肌无力的患者时,低频重复神经刺激时出现渐进性递减模式这一发现可能会提醒肌电图检查者注意兰伯特 - 伊顿综合征的可能性,并促使其进行进一步的电诊断测试。

相似文献

1
Decrement pattern in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome is different from myasthenia gravis.兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征的递减模式与重症肌无力不同。
Neuromuscul Disord. 2006 Jul;16(7):454-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
2
Stimulated single-fiber electromyography in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征中的刺激单纤维肌电图
Muscle Nerve. 1991 Dec;14(12):1227-30. doi: 10.1002/mus.880141215.
3
Is the decremental pattern in Lambert-Eaton syndrome different from that in myasthenia gravis?兰伯特-伊顿综合征的递减模式与重症肌无力的递减模式不同吗?
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jun;125(6):1274-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
4
Electrophysiological diagnostic criteria of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征的电生理诊断标准。
Muscle Nerve. 2005 Oct;32(4):515-20. doi: 10.1002/mus.20389.
5
Distinguishing Features of the Repetitive Nerve Stimulation Test Between Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome and Myasthenia Gravis, 50-Year Reappraisal.兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征与重症肌无力重复神经电刺激试验的鉴别特征:50年再评估
J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2017 Dec;19(2):66-75. doi: 10.1097/CND.0000000000000190.
6
Repetitive nerve stimulation studies in the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征的重复神经刺激研究
Muscle Nerve. 1994 Sep;17(9):995-1001. doi: 10.1002/mus.880170906.
7
Myasthenia gravis Lambert-Eaton overlap syndrome.重症肌无力-兰伯特-伊顿重叠综合征
Muscle Nerve. 2016 Jan;53(1):20-6. doi: 10.1002/mus.24921. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
8
[Decrement pattern of M-response amplitude in the low-frequency repetitive nerve stimulation in the muscles of patients with myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome].[重症肌无力和兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征患者肌肉低频重复神经刺激中M反应幅度的递减模式]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2017;117(2):93-96. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20171172193-96.
9
Repetitive nerve stimulation and single-fiber electromyography in the evaluation of patients with suspected myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: Review of recent literature.重复神经刺激和单纤维肌电图在疑似重症肌无力或兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征患者评估中的应用:近期文献综述
Muscle Nerve. 2015 Sep;52(3):455-62. doi: 10.1002/mus.24745. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
10
Peroneal nerve repetitive nerve stimulation test: its value in diagnosis of myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.腓总神经重复神经电刺激试验:其在重症肌无力和兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征诊断中的价值。
Muscle Nerve. 1995 Aug;18(8):867-73. doi: 10.1002/mus.880180811.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavior of jittering potential before and after impulse blockings: a preliminary study in myasthenia gravis.冲动阻断前后抖动电位的行为:重症肌无力的初步研究
Biomed Eng Lett. 2024 Jun 14;14(6):1303-1318. doi: 10.1007/s13534-024-00401-3. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Presynaptic Paraneoplastic Disorders of the Neuromuscular Junction: An Update.神经肌肉接头的突触前副肿瘤性疾病:最新进展
Brain Sci. 2021 Aug 3;11(8):1035. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11081035.
3
History of Myasthenia Gravis Revisited.重症肌无力病史再探。
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2020 Nov 7;58(2):154-162. doi: 10.29399/npa.27315. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis.重症肌无力的诊断
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 16;10(8):1736. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081736.
5
CMAP decrement by low-frequency repetitive nerve stimulation in different hand muscles of ALS patients.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者不同手部肌肉低频重复神经刺激的 CMAP 递减。
Neurol Sci. 2019 Dec;40(12):2609-2615. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04027-7. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
6
Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic syndrome: early diagnosis is key.兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征:早期诊断是关键。
Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis. 2019 May 13;9:27-37. doi: 10.2147/DNND.S192588. eCollection 2019.
7
Modelling the response to low-frequency repetitive nerve stimulation of myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.重症肌无力和兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征低频重复神经刺激反应的建模
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016 Nov;54(11):1761-1778. doi: 10.1007/s11517-016-1462-4. Epub 2016 Mar 25.