Tim R W, Sanders D B
Division of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Muscle Nerve. 1994 Sep;17(9):995-1001. doi: 10.1002/mus.880170906.
We compared changes in amplitude and area of surface recorded compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) during 20-Hz repetitive nerve stimulation and after maximum voluntary contraction in patients with the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), myasthenia gravis (MG), and normal controls. There was greater potentiation of CMAP amplitude after voluntary contraction than during 20-Hz stimulation in 10 of 14 LEMS patients; CMAP area increased more after exercise than during 20-Hz stimulation in all LEMS patients. Although abnormal potentiation of CMAP area and amplitude was seen in equal numbers of LEMS patients, more LEMS patients demonstrated a greater than 100% potentiation of CMAP area than of CMAP amplitude. We conclude that maximum voluntary contraction is preferable to brief 20-Hz RNS to demonstrate potentiation in LEMS because it is at least as sensitive and is less painful. Measurement of CMAP area in LEMS patients is not better than measuring the change in CMAP amplitude in demonstrating abnormal potentiation. Testing of a single hand muscle for potentiation in LEMS does not demonstrate abnormal potentiation in all LEMS patients.
我们比较了兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征(LEMS)、重症肌无力(MG)患者及正常对照在20赫兹重复神经刺激期间及最大自主收缩后,表面记录的复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)的幅度和面积变化。14例LEMS患者中有10例,自主收缩后CMAP幅度的增强大于20赫兹刺激期间;所有LEMS患者运动后CMAP面积的增加均大于20赫兹刺激期间。虽然在相同数量的LEMS患者中观察到CMAP面积和幅度的异常增强,但更多LEMS患者CMAP面积的增强超过100%,而CMAP幅度的增强则未超过。我们得出结论,在LEMS中,最大自主收缩比短暂的20赫兹重复神经刺激更适合用于显示增强,因为它至少同样敏感且疼痛较轻。在显示异常增强方面,测量LEMS患者的CMAP面积并不比测量CMAP幅度的变化更好。对LEMS患者的单块手部肌肉进行增强测试,并不能在所有LEMS患者中显示出异常增强。