Suppr超能文献

高频脑电图活动增加解释了脑电图频谱熵监测仪在氯胺酮麻醉期间的不佳表现。

Increase in high frequency EEG activity explains the poor performance of EEG spectral entropy monitor during S-ketamine anesthesia.

作者信息

Maksimow A, Särkelä M, Långsjö J W, Salmi E, Kaisti K K, Yli-Hankala A, Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki S, Scheinin H, Jääskeläinen S K

机构信息

Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Aug;117(8):1660-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.05.011. Epub 2006 Jun 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of S-ketamine on the EEG and to investigate whether spectral entropy of the EEG can be used to assess the depth of hypnosis during S-ketamine anesthesia.

METHODS

The effects of sub-anesthetic (159 (21); mean (SD) ng/ml) and anesthetic (1,959 (442) ng/ml) serum concentrations of S-ketamine on state entropy (SE), response entropy (RE) and classical EEG spectral power variables (recorded using the Entropy Module, GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland) were studied in 8 healthy males. These EEG data were compared with EEG recordings from 6 matching subjects anesthetized with propofol.

RESULTS

The entropy values decreased from the baseline SE 85 (3) and RE 96 (3) to SE 55 (18) and RE 72 (17) during S-ketamine anesthesia but both inter- and intra-individual variation of entropy indices was wide and their specificity to indicate unconsciousness was poor. Propofol induced more pronounced increase in delta power (P<0.02) than S-ketamine, whereas anesthetic S-ketamine induced more high frequency EEG activity in the gamma band (P<0.001). Relative power of 20-70 Hz EEG activity was associated with high SE (P=0.02) and RE (P=0.03) values during S-ketamine anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

These differences in low and high frequency EEG power bands probably explain why entropy monitor, while adequate for propofol, is not suitable for assessing the depth of S-ketamine anesthesia.

SIGNIFICANCE

The entropy monitor is not adequate for monitoring S-ketamine-induced hypnosis.

摘要

目的

研究S-氯胺酮对脑电图(EEG)的影响,并探讨EEG频谱熵能否用于评估S-氯胺酮麻醉期间的催眠深度。

方法

在8名健康男性中研究了亚麻醉剂量(159(21);均值(标准差)ng/ml)和麻醉剂量(1959(442)ng/ml)的S-氯胺酮血清浓度对状态熵(SE)、反应熵(RE)和经典EEG频谱功率变量(使用芬兰赫尔辛基通用电气医疗集团的熵模块记录)的影响。将这些EEG数据与6名接受丙泊酚麻醉的匹配受试者的EEG记录进行比较。

结果

在S-氯胺酮麻醉期间,熵值从基线SE 85(3)和RE 96(3)降至SE 55(18)和RE 72(17),但熵指数的个体间和个体内变异都很大,其指示无意识状态的特异性较差。丙泊酚引起的δ波功率增加比S-氯胺酮更明显(P<0.02),而麻醉剂量的S-氯胺酮在γ波段引起更多的高频EEG活动(P<0.001)。在S-氯胺酮麻醉期间,20-70Hz EEG活动的相对功率与高SE(P=0.02)和RE(P=0.03)值相关。

结论

低频和高频EEG功率带的这些差异可能解释了为什么熵监测仪虽然适用于丙泊酚,但不适用于评估S-氯胺酮麻醉的深度。

意义

熵监测仪不适用于监测S-氯胺酮诱导的催眠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验