Macfarlane Duncan J, Lee Cherry C Y, Ho Edmond Y K, Chan K L, Chan Dionise T S
Institute of Human Performance, The University of Hong Kong, 111-113 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
J Sci Med Sport. 2007 Feb;10(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-C). The IPAQ-C was administered three times to each participant to examine the stability and reliability of the self-reported physical activity, whilst data to examine concurrent validity were acquired over 7 consecutive days using a physical activity log (PA-log), and an MTI accelerometer. A complete set of data was obtained from 49 Chinese residents (range 15-55 years; 30 males). The total physical activity recorded by IPAQ-C was acceptably reliable (ICC of 0.79 and %CV of 26%). There was weak agreement between IPAQ-C and the total MTI-derived activity and any of its constituent sub-components. Better agreement was seen between IPAQ-C and the PA-log data, with no significant difference between average total activity (3931 and 4047 MET min week(-1), respectively, p=0.51), and a bias and LOA of 3% and 94% of the mean score, respectively. Although these statistics are not dissimilar to those reported on other self-report physical activity questionnaires, suggesting the IPAQ-C is adequately reliable and valid for the measurement of total physical activity in a Chinese population, care needs to be taken, especially as the sub-components of total activity were markedly less valid and reliable.
本研究旨在检验中文版国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ-C)的信度和效度。对每位参与者进行三次IPAQ-C问卷调查,以检验自我报告体力活动的稳定性和信度,同时使用体力活动日志(PA-log)和MTI加速度计连续7天收集数据,以检验同时效度。从49名中国居民(年龄范围15 - 55岁;30名男性)获得了完整的数据集。IPAQ-C记录的总体力活动具有可接受的信度(组内相关系数为0.79,变异系数百分比为26%)。IPAQ-C与MTI得出的总活动量及其任何组成子成分之间的一致性较弱。IPAQ-C与PA-log数据之间的一致性较好,平均总活动量之间无显著差异(分别为3931和每周4047梅脱分钟,p = 0.51),偏差和一致性界限分别为平均得分的3%和94%。尽管这些统计数据与其他自我报告体力活动问卷所报告的数据并无不同,这表明IPAQ-C对于测量中国人群的总体力活动具有足够的信度和效度,但仍需谨慎,尤其是总活动量的子成分的效度和信度明显较低。