J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):301-13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-301.
The duration of pigeons' key pecks was studied in three experiments. Experiment I revealed that key pecks early in exposure to continuous reinforcement were of short duration, as were key pecks observed on an omission procedure in which pecks prevented food delivery. Key pecks later in exposure to continuous reinforcement, and those that occurred on positive automaintenance procedures, were of long duration. In Experiment II, pigeons were exposed to fixed-interval and fixed-ratio reinforcement schedules, and durations were recorded separately for each quarter of each interval or ratio. On fixed interval, durations were shorter in the first quarter of each interval than in subsequent quarters; on fixed ratio, durations were longer in the first quarter of the ratio than in subsequent quarters. These data parallel observations of concurrent operant responding and salivation in dogs. In Experiment III, pigeons were exposed to a discrete trial, differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 6-sec schedule. Durations of responses in the first 2 sec of the trial were substantially shorter than those of responses that occurred later. The data from all three experiments support the view that the pigeon's "key peck" actually consists of two subclasses of peck, one reflexive and one operant.
本研究在三个实验中探讨了鸽子啄键的时长。实验一表明,鸽子在接受连续强化早期的啄键时长较短,而在啄键阻止食物传递的消退程序中观察到的啄键时长也较短。在连续强化后期的啄键时长和在正强化自动维持程序中观察到的啄键时长则较长。在实验二中,鸽子接受了固定间隔和固定比率强化程序,每个间隔或比率的前四分之一的啄键时长都被单独记录。在固定间隔上,每个间隔的前四分之一的啄键时长比后续四分之一的啄键时长短;在固定比率上,比率的前四分之一的啄键时长比后续四分之一的啄键时长长。这些数据与狗的同时操作性反应和唾液分泌的观察结果相似。在实验三中,鸽子接受了离散试验、差异强化低速率 6 秒程序。在试验的前 2 秒内,啄键的时长明显短于随后的啄键时长。这三个实验的数据均支持这样的观点,即鸽子的“啄键”实际上由两类啄键组成,一类是反射性的,一类是操作性的。