Picker M, Poling A
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 May;37(3):393-406. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-393.
Previous investigations have shown that rate, latency, and percentage of trials with at least one response are somewhat insensitive measures of the strength of autoshaped responding. In the present studies, these measures were contrasted with the allocation of responding during simultaneous choice tests, a measure of response strength frequently used in operant paradigms. In two experiments, nine pigeons were exposed to a forward pairing autoshaping procedure. Training sessions consisted of the successive presentation of three stimuli, each followed by food on either 100%, 50%, or 0% of the trials. Choice testing involved the simultaneous presentation of the three stimuli. In Experiment I, all pigeons consistently directed their initial choice responses and the majority of subsequent responses to the stimulus always followed by food, despite the fact that during training sessions the response rates of most birds were highest in the presence of the stimulus followed by food on 50% of the trials. In Experiment II, rate, latency, and percentage of trials with at least one response did not change appreciably as a function of duration of feeder presentations. However, choice responding was lawfully affected by duration of feeder presentations. These data suggest that choice is perhaps a more sensitive measure of the strength of autoshaped responding than other, more commonly employed, indices.
先前的研究表明,速率、潜伏期以及至少有一次反应的试验百分比,对于自动形成的反应强度而言,是有些不敏感的测量指标。在本研究中,将这些指标与同时选择测试期间反应的分配情况进行了对比,同时选择测试是操作范式中常用的一种反应强度测量方法。在两个实验中,九只鸽子接受了正向配对自动形成程序。训练环节包括依次呈现三种刺激,每种刺激在100%、50%或0%的试验中随后伴有食物。选择测试涉及同时呈现这三种刺激。在实验一中,所有鸽子始终将其最初的选择反应以及大多数后续反应指向总是伴有食物的刺激,尽管在训练环节中,大多数鸽子在50%的试验中,在伴有食物的刺激出现时反应速率最高。在实验二中,速率、潜伏期以及至少有一次反应的试验百分比并未随着喂食器呈现时间的长短而有明显变化。然而,选择反应却受到喂食器呈现时间的合理影响。这些数据表明,与其他更常用的指标相比,选择可能是对自动形成反应强度更敏感的测量指标。