Suppr超能文献

人类的强化和替代:多项反应分析。

Reinforcement and substitution in humans: a multiple-response analysis.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Nov;30(3):243-53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-243.

Abstract

Three adult human subjects engaged in activities such as reading, sewing, artwork, and candlemaking while living alone in a laboratory apartment 24 hours per day for several weeks. After a baseline period in which the activities were fully available, access to a particular activity (contingent response) was made dependent on engaging in another less-preferred activity (instrumental response). The contingencies produced substantial increases in instrumental responding, and responding decreased toward baseline levels when the dependency was removed. Under the contingent conditions, time earned for the concurrent activity was always less than the baseline level. To determine the contribution of this reduction to the instrumental increase, access to the contingent activity was restricted in the absence of any dependency. The results indicated that increases among responses that filled the newly available time could be selective, e.g., artwork increased when reading was restricted but candlemaking did not. It was concluded that the reductions in the contingent response that accompany contingencies usually do not exclusively determine instrumental increases, but selective increases can contribute to the increase in time devoted to the instrumental response.

摘要

三名成年人类受试者在实验室公寓中独自生活,每天 24 小时进行阅读、缝纫、艺术创作和制作蜡烛等活动。在基线期内,所有活动都完全可用,然后使参与特定活动(条件反应)取决于进行另一种不太受欢迎的活动(工具反应)。这些条件反应产生了大量的工具反应增加,当依赖性消除时,反应会减少到基线水平。在条件反应下,同时进行的活动所赚取的时间总是少于基线水平。为了确定这种减少对工具增加的贡献,在没有任何依赖性的情况下限制对条件活动的访问。结果表明,填补新可用时间的反应增加可以是选择性的,例如,当限制阅读时,艺术创作增加,但制作蜡烛没有增加。结论是,伴随条件反应的条件反应减少通常不会专门决定工具反应的增加,但选择性增加可能有助于增加对工具反应的时间投入。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验