Hanley Gregory P, Cammilleri Anthony P, Tiger Jeffrey H, Ingvarsson Einar T
Psychology Department, Western New England College, 1215 Wilbraham Road, Springfield, Massachusetts 01119, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):603-18. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.603-618.
We designed a series of analyses to develop a measurement system capable of simultaneously recording the free-play patterns of 20 children in a preschool classroom. Study 1 determined the intermittency with which the location and engagement of each child could be momentarily observed before the accuracy of the measurement was compromised. Results showed that intervals up to 120 s introduced less than 10% measurement error. Study 2 determined the extent of agreement between two observers who simultaneously collected data for 20 children using 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120-s momentary time sampling (MTS) intervals. The three larger intervals resulted in high levels of interobserver agreement (above 90%), whereas the 30-s interval resulted in unacceptably low levels of agreement (less than 80%). By allowing observers to select from among the different MTS intervals via a datasheet array and then collect data with the chosen system, Study 3 determined observers' preferences for the remaining MTS intervals. Both data collectors preferred the 90-s MTS procedure. The sensitivity of the 90-s MTS procedure, which was shown to be accurate, reliable, and preferred, was then demonstrated by its use to describe activity preferences of a classroom of children in Study 4. This system identified high- and low-preference activities for individual children and revealed interesting patterns of response allocation by the group.
我们设计了一系列分析,以开发一种能够同时记录20名学龄前儿童在幼儿园教室中自由活动模式的测量系统。研究1确定了在测量准确性受到影响之前,可以瞬间观察每个儿童位置和参与情况的间歇性。结果表明,长达120秒的间隔引入的测量误差小于10%。研究2确定了两名观察者之间的一致性程度,他们使用30秒、60秒、90秒和120秒的瞬间时间抽样(MTS)间隔,同时为20名儿童收集数据。三个较长的间隔导致了较高的观察者间一致性水平(超过90%),而30秒的间隔导致了不可接受的低一致性水平(低于80%)。通过允许观察者通过数据表阵列从不同的MTS间隔中进行选择,然后使用所选系统收集数据,研究3确定了观察者对其余MTS间隔的偏好。两位数据收集者都更喜欢90秒的MTS程序。在研究4中,90秒MTS程序被用于描述一个班级儿童的活动偏好,从而证明了其准确性、可靠性和受欢迎程度。该系统确定了个别儿童的高偏好和低偏好活动,并揭示了该群体有趣的反应分配模式。