Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚采用聚合酶链反应/酶免疫测定法诊断沙眼衣原体眼部感染

Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis eye infection in Tanzania by polymerase chain reaction/enzyme immunoassay.

作者信息

Bobo L, Munoz B, Viscidi R, Quinn T, Mkocha H, West S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

出版信息

Lancet. 1991 Oct 5;338(8771):847-50. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91502-l.

Abstract

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis eye infection is largely unsatisfactory by standard laboratory methods. A polymerase chain reaction/enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) that had previously been successful for diagnosis of genital C trachomatis infection was compared with direct antibody immunofluorescence (DFA) for detection of the organism in conjunctival scrapes. 234 Tanzanian children aged 1-7 years living in a village that had had no previous trachoma control programme were classified clinically as having no sign of trachoma (0) n = 97, follicular trachoma (TF) n = 100, or intense inflammatory trachoma with or without TF (TI +/- TF) n = 37. PCR-EIA detected C trachomatis in 24%, 54%, and 95% of subjects, respectively, compared with elementary body (EB) detection by DFA of 1%, 28%, and 60%, respectively. Overall prevalence of chlamydial eye infection was 22% by DFA compared with 48% by PCR-EIA. Of subjects with chlamydial DNA at pretreatment, 103 (92%) had no detectable chlamydial DNA at the end of 4 weeks of ocular tetracycline. The findings show that PCR-EIA is likely to affect trachoma diagnosis and epidemiology because of the increased sensitivity for detection of C trachomatis in all clinical groups; the less stringent requirements for specimen collection and transport make this method suitable for field use. Moreover, the semi-quantitative aspect of PCR-EIA may be useful for monitoring a decrease in chlamydial DNA after treatment.

摘要

采用标准实验室方法检测沙眼衣原体眼部感染,结果大多不尽人意。此前用于诊断生殖系统沙眼衣原体感染的聚合酶链反应/酶免疫分析(PCR-EIA),与直接抗体免疫荧光法(DFA)相比,用于检测结膜刮片中的病原体。234名年龄在1至7岁、居住在一个此前未实施过沙眼控制项目村庄的坦桑尼亚儿童,经临床分类为无沙眼体征(0)(n = 97)、滤泡性沙眼(TF)(n = 100)或伴有或不伴有TF的重度炎性沙眼(TI +/- TF)(n = 37)。PCR-EIA分别在24%、54%和95%的受试者中检测到沙眼衣原体,相比之下,DFA检测到的原体(EB)分别为1%、28%和60%。DFA检测到的衣原体眼部感染总体患病率为22%,而PCR-EIA为48%。在治疗前检测到衣原体DNA的受试者中,103名(92%)在眼部使用四环素4周结束时未检测到衣原体DNA。研究结果表明,由于PCR-EIA在所有临床组中检测沙眼衣原体的敏感性增加,可能会影响沙眼的诊断和流行病学;对标本采集和运输的要求不那么严格,使该方法适用于现场使用。此外,PCR-EIA的半定量方面可能有助于监测治疗后衣原体DNA的减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验