J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Sep;36(2):151-69. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-151.
Ducklings (5 to 28 days old) were trained to peck a pole on fixed-ratio, fixed-interval, and multiple schedules using brief presentation of an imprinting stimulus as the response-contingent event. Other ducklings of the same age were trained similarly except that reinforcement consisted of access to water. With water reinforcement the typical fixed-ratio ("break-run"), fixed-interval ("scallop"), and multiple schedule response patterns were readily established and consistently maintained. With the imprinting stimulus these schedule effects were inconsistent in some subjects and virtually nonexistent in others, despite extended training. Schedule control with the imprinting stimulus was not improved by the use of a reinforcement signaling procedure which enhances responding reinforced by electrical brain stimulation on intermittent schedules. However, the overall rates of responding and the extinction functions generated after reinforcement with water versus the imprinting stimulus were comparable. These findings imply that control by temporal and discriminative stimuli may be relatively weak when a young organism's behavior is reinforced by presentation of an imprinting stimulus.
雏鸭(5 至 28 日龄)接受训练,在固定比例、固定间隔和多个时间表上啄一根杆子,将印记刺激的短暂呈现作为反应相关事件。同年龄的其他雏鸭接受类似的训练,但强化物是获得水。使用水强化,典型的固定比例(“破跑”)、固定间隔(“扇贝”)和多个时间表反应模式很容易建立并始终保持。对于这些时间表效应,对于一些受试者来说是不一致的,而对于其他受试者来说则几乎不存在,尽管进行了扩展训练。使用强化信号程序来增强间歇性时间表上电脑刺激强化的反应,并没有改善印记刺激的时间表控制。然而,在用水和印记刺激强化后的整体反应率和消退函数是可比的。这些发现表明,当年轻生物体的行为通过呈现印记刺激得到强化时,时间和辨别刺激的控制可能相对较弱。