J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):485-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-485.
Schedule research has been the core of operant conditioning, but it is no longer an active area, at least with respect to its traditional focus of describing and explaining moment-to-moment behavior. Yet schedules are central in psychology: Not only do they establish lawful behavior, but they also play a major role in determining the effects of other variables. The reason for the decline appears to be primarily theoretical, in that the work seems not to have led to meaningful integration. The search for controlling variables brought into play by schedule specification has proven unsuccessful, and a catalog of all possible schedule effects is of limited interest. The paper reviews the reasons for the contemporary state of affairs. One prediction about future developments is that instead of revealing component variables and their modes of interaction, schedule effects will be treated as basic empirical laws. Theory will take the form of abstract statements that integrate these separate laws by reference to higher-order principles rather than by reduction to supposedly simpler component variables.
时间安排研究一直是操作性条件作用的核心,但它不再是一个活跃的领域,至少就其传统的描述和解释瞬间行为的重点而言是这样。然而,时间表在心理学中是至关重要的:它们不仅建立了规律性的行为,而且在确定其他变量的影响方面也起着重要作用。下降的原因主要是理论上的,因为这项工作似乎没有导致有意义的综合。对由时间表规范引入的控制变量的搜索被证明是不成功的,而所有可能的时间表效果的目录的兴趣有限。本文回顾了当代事态的原因。对未来发展的一个预测是,时间表效应不会像揭示组成变量及其相互作用模式那样,而是将其视为基本的经验规律。理论将采取抽象陈述的形式,通过参考更高阶的原则而不是简化为所谓的更简单的组成变量来整合这些单独的规律。