Wanchisen B A
Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;13(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03392515.
While a great deal of behavior analytic research has focussed on studying current contingencies, the amount of work done in the area of conditioning history is spotty, at best. Weiner (1964, 1969) conducted history research with human subjects, but little has followed in either the human or the nonhuman literature. Some direction can also be found in the literature studying the effects of conditioning on drug effects (e.g., Barrett, 1977; Urbain, Poling, Millam, & Thompson, 1978). However, "behavioral history" or "conditioning history" has not been a fully-developed area within behavior analysis. It is suggested that empirical work on history effects might have implications for (a) better understanding human-nonhuman behavioral differences and similarities, (b) clinical applications, especially where clients are resistant to behavioral change, and (c) theoretical assumptions in behavior analysis in relation to both basic and applied concerns.
虽然大量行为分析研究专注于当前的偶发事件，但在条件作用历史领域所做的工作充其量也只是零零散散的。维纳（1964年、1969年）对人类受试者进行了历史研究，但在人类或非人类文献中后续跟进的研究很少。在研究条件作用对药物效果的影响的文献中也能找到一些方向（例如，巴雷特，1977年；乌尔班、波林、米拉姆和汤普森，1978年）。然而，“行为历史”或“条件作用历史”在行为分析中并不是一个充分发展的领域。有人认为，关于历史效应的实证研究可能对以下方面有影响：（a）更好地理解人类与非人类行为的差异和相似之处；（b）临床应用，特别是在客户抗拒行为改变的情况下；（c）行为分析中与基础和应用问题相关的理论假设。
