Suppr超能文献

同时性日程安排绩效:相对和总体强化率的影响。

Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):21-36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-21.

Abstract

Six pigeons were trained to respond on two keys, each of which provided reinforcers on an arithmetic variable-interval schedule. These concurrent schedules ran nonindependently with a 2-s changeover delay. Six sets of conditions were conducted. Within each set of conditions the ratio of reinforcers available on the two alternatives was varied, but the arranged overall reinforcer rate remained constant. Each set of conditions used a different overall reinforcer rate, ranging from 0.22 reinforcers per minute to 10 reinforcers per minute. The generalized matching law fit the data from each set of conditions, but sensitivity to reinforcer frequency (a) decreased as the overall reinforcer rate decreased for both time allocation and response allocation based analyses of the data. Overall response rates did not vary with changes in relative reinforcer rate, but decreased with decreases in overall reinforcer rate. Changeover rates varied as a function of both relative and overall reinforcer rates. However, as explanations based on changeover rate seem unable to deal with the changes in generalized matching sensitivity, discrimination accounts of choice may offer a more promising interpretation.

摘要

六只鸽子被训练在两个键上做出反应,每个键都在算术变时距程序上提供强化物。这些并发程序以 2 秒的转换延迟非独立运行。进行了六组条件实验。在每组条件中,两种选择上可用的强化物的比率不同,但安排的总体强化物率保持不变。每组条件使用不同的总体强化物率,范围从每分钟 0.22 个强化物到每分钟 10 个强化物。广义匹配律适用于每组条件的数据,但基于时间分配和反应分配的数据分析表明,对强化物频率的敏感性(a)随着总体强化物率的降低而降低。总体反应率不会随相对强化物率的变化而变化,但会随总体强化物率的降低而降低。转换率随相对和总体强化物率的变化而变化。然而,由于基于转换率的解释似乎无法处理广义匹配敏感性的变化,因此选择的辨别解释可能提供更有前途的解释。

相似文献

1
Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):21-36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-21.
2
Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):445-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-445.
4
Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Sep;108(2):204-222. doi: 10.1002/jeab.269. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):169-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-169.
6
Residence time and choice in concurrent foraging schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):423-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-423.
7
Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jan;79(1):87-109. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-87.
8
Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):339-49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-339.
9
Behavior-dependent reinforcer-rate changes in concurrent schedules: A further analysis.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):1-19. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-1.
10
Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 May;79(3):351-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-351.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconceptualized Associative Learning.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Apr 2;48(2):203-239. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00442-8. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Rimonabant's reductive effects on high densities of food reinforcement, but not palatability, in lean and obese Zucker rats.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 May;231(10):2159-70. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3366-4. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
3
Selection dynamics in joint matching to rate and magnitude of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Sep;98(2):199-212. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-199.
5
Differential reinforcement and resistance to change of divided-attention performance.
Learn Behav. 2012 Jun;40(2):158-69. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0052-4.
6
Stimulus disparity and punisher control of human signal-detection performance.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Mar;93(2):185-201. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-185.
7
The dynamics of the law of effect: a comparison of models.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Jan;93(1):91-127. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-91.
8
Effects of point-loss punishers on human signal-detection performance.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jul;92(1):17-39. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-17.
9
Within-session transitions in choice: a structural and quantitative analysis.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 May;91(3):319-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-319.
10
A computational theory of selection by consequences applied to concurrent schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):387-403. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-387.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantitative analysis.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):421-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-421.
2
The assumptions underlying the generalized matching law.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):101-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-101.
3
Undermatching and overmatching as deviations from the matching law.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Nov;40(3):333-40. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-333.
4
Matching, statistics, and common sense.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 May;39(3):499-501. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-499.
5
Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):191-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-191.
6
On the effects of component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 May;37(3):417-39. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-417.
7
Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):203-14. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-203.
8
Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Sep;24(2):191-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-191.
9
On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231.
10
Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jul;18(1):35-43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-35.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验