• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

并发日程安排:强化物大小效应。

Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.

作者信息

Landon Jason, Davison Michael, Elliffe Douglas

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 May;79(3):351-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-351.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.2003.79-351
PMID:12908762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1284939/
Abstract

Five pigeons were trained on pairs of concurrent variable-interval schedules in a switching-key procedure. The arranged overall rate of reinforcement was constant in all conditions, and the reinforcer-magnitude ratios obtained from the two alternatives were varied over five levels. Each condition remained in effect for 65 sessions and the last 50 sessions of data from each condition were analyzed. At a molar level of analysis, preference was described well by a version of the generalized matching law, consistent with previous reports. More local analyses showed that recently obtained reinforcers had small measurable effects on current preference, with the most recently obtained reinforcer having a substantially larger effect. Larger reinforcers resulted in larger and longer preference pulses, and a small preference was maintained for the larger-magnitude alternative even after long inter-reinforcer intervals. These results are consistent with the notion that the variables controlling choice have both short- and long-term effects. Moreover, they suggest that control by reinforcer magnitude is exerted in a manner similar to control by reinforcer frequency. Lower sensitivities when reinforcer magnitude is varied are likely to be due to equal frequencies of different sized preference pulses, whereas higher sensitivities when reinforcer rates are varied might result from changes in the frequencies of different sized preference pulses.

摘要

五只鸽子在一种切换键程序中接受了成对的并发可变间隔时间表的训练。在所有条件下,安排的总体强化速率是恒定的,并且从两种选择中获得的强化物大小比率在五个水平上变化。每个条件持续65个实验期,并对每个条件下最后50个实验期的数据进行分析。在宏观分析水平上,偏好可以用广义匹配定律的一个版本很好地描述,这与之前的报告一致。更细致的分析表明,最近获得的强化物对当前偏好有微小的可测量影响,其中最近获得的强化物影响显著更大。更大的强化物导致更大、持续时间更长的偏好脉冲,并且即使在强化物间隔时间很长之后,对更大大小的选择仍保持着小的偏好。这些结果与控制选择的变量具有短期和长期影响的观点一致。此外,它们表明强化物大小的控制方式与强化物频率的控制方式相似。当强化物大小变化时较低的敏感性可能是由于不同大小偏好脉冲的频率相等,而当强化物速率变化时较高的敏感性可能是由于不同大小偏好脉冲频率的变化。

相似文献

1
Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.并发日程安排:强化物大小效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 May;79(3):351-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-351.
2
Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.并发程序安排:强化物的短期和长期影响
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 May;77(3):257-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-257.
3
Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.并发式程序中对相对强化率的敏感性:与相对和绝对强化持续时间无关。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jan;75(1):25-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-25.
4
Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.每一次强化都很重要:强化物强度与局部偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jul;80(1):95-129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-95.
5
Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.在四个选项之间的稳态选择遵循恒定比例规则。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jul;104(1):7-19. doi: 10.1002/jeab.157. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.在多个选项中进行选择:相对强化率和总体强化率。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Sep;108(2):204-222. doi: 10.1002/jeab.269. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.关于时间和强化物比例变化对偏好的联合控制
Behav Processes. 2013 May;95:100-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
8
Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.并发日程安排中的局部偏好:强化物序列的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jul;84(1):37-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.114-04.
9
Relative reinforcer rates and magnitudes do not control concurrent choice independently.相对强化率和强度并不能独立控制同时进行的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Sep;90(2):169-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-169.
10
Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.转换过程中的并发程序表现:转换延迟与信号强化比率
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jan;79(1):87-109. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-87.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrasting effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on differential resistance to change in humans.强化物频率和强度对人类改变阻力差异的对比效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2025 Jul;124(1):e70027. doi: 10.1002/jeab.70027.
2
Online Healthy Food Experiments: Capturing Complexity by Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.在线健康食品实验:运用基于选择的联合分析捕捉复杂性
Behav Anal. 2017 Oct 2;40(2):373-391. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0114-9. eCollection 2017 Nov.
3
Neurons in the Pigeon Nidopallium Caudolaterale Display Value-Related Activity.鸽子尾侧苍白球中的神经元表现出与价值相关的活动。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 29;8(1):5377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23694-8.
4
Selection dynamics in joint matching to rate and magnitude of reinforcement.联合匹配到强化的速率和幅度的选择动态。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Sep;98(2):199-212. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-199.
5
What are we doing when we translate from quantitative models?当我们从定量模型进行翻译时,我们在做什么?
Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;32(2):339-62. doi: 10.1007/BF03392197.
6
The matching relation and situation-specific bias modulation in professional football play selection.职业足球比赛选择中的匹配关系和情境特定的偏差调节。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 May;93(3):435-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-435.
7
Dynamics of choice: relative rate and amount affect local preference at three different time scales.选择的动态变化:相对率和量在三个不同的时间尺度上影响局部偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 May;91(3):293-317. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-293.
8
Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the role of magnitude, contiguity, and wholeness.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)对食物量的感知:数量、连续性和整体性的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Oct;35(4):516-24. doi: 10.1037/a0015488.
9
Conditional reinforcers and informative stimuli in a constant environment.恒定环境中的条件强化物和信息性刺激
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jan;91(1):41-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-41.
10
Relative reinforcer rates and magnitudes do not control concurrent choice independently.相对强化率和强度并不能独立控制同时进行的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Sep;90(2):169-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-169.

本文引用的文献

1
Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers.同时选择:强化物整体频率和强化物时间分布的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):445-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-445.
2
Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration.同时性时间表:强化频率与强化持续时间的相互作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):339-49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-339.
3
Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.同时性日程安排绩效:相对和总体强化率的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):21-36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-21.
4
Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.同时进行的可变时距程序表现:固定与混合强化物时距。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):169-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-169.
5
Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: New data with a different procedure.频率与强化幅度:采用不同程序获得的新数据。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):157-67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-157.
6
Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.同时进行的算术和指数时间表中的强化敏感性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):191-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-191.
7
Duration and rate of reinforcement as determinants of concurrent responding.强化的时长和速率作为同时反应的决定因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):145-53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-145.
8
On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.两种偏离匹配律的情况:偏向和不匹配。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231.
9
Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.强化物效力作为强化物率和大小的函数:对比同时表现。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):461-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-461.
10
Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances.频率和强化量的相互作用对同时进行的表现的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 May;19(3):451-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-451.