J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):97-108. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-97.
A successive matching procedure was used to investigate which aspect of the test-omission procedure is responsible for establishing a postsample stimulus as a cue to forget in pigeons. It was found that a postsample stimulus that reliably followed a sample that was irrelevant to performance functioned as a cue to forget. This result was obtained regardless of whether termination of that postsample stimulus was followed by reinforcement or by the presentation of sample-independent discriminative stimuli. It was also found that a postsample stimulus that functioned as a cue to forget at the beginning of training lost that function when it was repeatedly presented on trials in which the sample was relevant to performance. These findings reveal that (a) neither a reduction in reinforcement rate nor the omission of the opportunity for discriminated responding is necessary to establish an effective cue to forget and (b) irrelevance of the sample to performance is a sufficient condition to establish a cue to forget. These results suggest that a postsample stimulus that is presented on trials in which remembering the sample is not reinforced differentially will come to set the occasion for not remembering the sample.
连续匹配程序被用来研究测试遗漏程序的哪个方面负责在鸽子中建立一个作为遗忘线索的样本后刺激。结果发现,一个可靠地跟随与表现无关的样本的样本后刺激可以作为遗忘线索。无论该样本后刺激的终止是否随后是强化还是呈现与样本无关的辨别刺激,都得到了这个结果。还发现,在训练开始时作为遗忘线索的样本后刺激,在与表现相关的试验中反复呈现时,会失去该功能。这些发现表明:(a) 减少强化率或排除辨别反应的机会并不是建立有效遗忘线索所必需的;(b) 样本与表现无关是建立遗忘线索的充分条件。这些结果表明,在不强化记忆样本的试验中呈现的样本后刺激将成为不记忆样本的机会。