Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class.
作者信息
Hayes S, Barnes D
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):235-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-235.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):235-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-235.
2
Failure to observe untested derived stimulus relations in extinction: implications for understanding stimulus-equivalence formation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Nov;102(3):311-26. doi: 10.1002/jeab.111. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
3
Resurgence of derived stimulus relations: replication and extensions.
Behav Processes. 2011 Jan;86(1):152-5. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
4
Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):489-504. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-489.
5
Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):65-76. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-65.
6
Functional equivalence in children: derived stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus relations.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Jul;66(1):1-17. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1997.2378.
7
Derived stimulus--response and stimulus--stimulus relations in children and adults: assessing training order effects.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Feb;78(2):130-54. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2563.
8
Arbitrary conditional discriminative functions of meaningful stimuli and enhanced equivalence class formation.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Mar;103(2):349-60. doi: 10.1002/jeab.141.
9
Training order and structural location of meaningful stimuli: effects on equivalence class formation.
Learn Behav. 2015 Dec;43(4):342-53. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0183-0.
10
Pigeons learn stimulus identity and stimulus relations when both serve as redundant, relevant cues during same-different discrimination training.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Jan;29(1):84-91.
引用本文的文献
1
Naming, Stimulus Equivalence and Relational Frame Theory: Stronger Together than Apart.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Jan 9;48(1):97-114. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00427-z. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Recent Developments in RFT Encourage Interbehavioral Field-Based Views of Human Language and Cognition: A Preliminary Analysis.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 May 9;47(3):675-690. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00407-3. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Using Relational Frame Theory to Examine Racial Prejudice: A Tool for Educators and an Appeal for Future Research.
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Dec 21;16(1):102-116. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00767-9. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Multiple exemplar instruction and the emergence of generative production of suffixes as autoclitic frames.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2012;28(1):83-99. doi: 10.1007/BF03393109.
5
Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: a citation analysis.
Behav Anal. 2010 Spring;33(1):97-117. doi: 10.1007/BF03392206.
6
The nature of clinical depression: symptoms, syndromes, and behavior analysis.
Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;31(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03392158.
7
Understanding metaphor: A relational frame perspective.
Behav Anal. 2001 Fall;24(2):191-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03392030.
8
Understanding complex behavior: the transformation of stimulus functions.
Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;23(2):239-54. doi: 10.1007/BF03392013.
9
Why it is crucial to understand thinking and feeling: An analysis and application to drug abuse.
Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;23(1):25-43. doi: 10.1007/BF03391997.
10
Moral behavior and the development of verbal regulation.
Behav Anal. 1998 Fall;21(2):253-79. doi: 10.1007/BF03391967.
Zotero 插件