Suppr超能文献

刺激类别的形成与刺激-强化物关系。

Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations.

作者信息

Dube W V, McIlvane W J, Maguire R W, Mackay H A, Stoddard L T

机构信息

Behavioral Neurology Department, E.K. Shriver Center, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):65-76. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-65.

Abstract

This study examined stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations. Mentally retarded subjects learned conditional discriminations with four two-member sets of visual stimuli (A, B, C, and D). On arbitrary-matching trials, they selected comparison stimuli B1 and B2 conditionally upon samples A1 and A2, respectively, and C1 and C2 conditionally upon B1 and B2, respectively. On identity-matching trials, they selected all stimuli as comparisons conditionally upon identical stimuli as samples. Throughout training, correct selections of A1, B1, C1, and D1 were followed by one reinforcer, R1, and those of A2, B2, C2, and D2 were followed by another, R2. Subsequent tests documented the formation of two four-member stimulus classes, A1-B1-C1-D1 and A2-B2-C2-D2. The class membership of the A, B, and C stimuli could have been based on equivalence relations that resulted from the arbitrary-matching training. D1 and D2 had never appeared on arbitrary-matching trials, however. Their class membership must have been based on relations with R1 and R2, respectively. Results thus confirm a previous finding that stimulus classes can be expanded via stimulus-reinforcer relations. They also define more precisely the potential nature of those classes and the conditions under which class membership can be established.

摘要

本研究考察了通过刺激-强化物关系建立的刺激类属关系。智力迟钝的受试者学习了四组由两个视觉刺激组成的条件辨别任务(A、B、C和D)。在任意匹配试验中,他们分别根据样本A1和A2有条件地选择比较刺激B1和B2,以及分别根据B1和B2有条件地选择C1和C2。在同一性匹配试验中,他们根据相同的刺激作为样本有条件地选择所有刺激作为比较。在整个训练过程中,正确选择A1、B1、C1和D1后给予一种强化物R1,正确选择A2、B2、C2和D2后给予另一种强化物R2。随后的测试记录了两个由四个刺激组成的刺激类别的形成,即A1-B1-C1-D1和A2-B2-C2-D2。A、B和C刺激的类属关系可能基于任意匹配训练产生的等价关系。然而,D1和D2从未出现在任意匹配试验中。它们的类属关系一定分别基于与R1和R2的关系。因此,结果证实了之前的一项发现,即刺激类别可以通过刺激-强化物关系进行扩展。它们还更精确地定义了这些类别的潜在性质以及建立类属关系的条件。

相似文献

5
Naming in conditional discrimination and stimulus equivalence.条件性辨别与刺激等价中的命名
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):379-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-379.

引用本文的文献

6
Membership of Defined Responses in Stimulus Classes.刺激类中特定反应的成员关系。
Psychol Rec. 2013 Sep 22;63(4):769-784. doi: 10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.4.005.
8
Associative concept learning in animals.动物的联想概念学习
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):130-51. doi: 10.1002/jeab.55. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
9
Evidence for response membership in stimulus classes by pigeons.鸽子对刺激类别的反应成员的证据。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Mar;99(2):129-49. doi: 10.1002/jeab.17. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

2
The structure of equivalence classes.等价类的结构。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):317-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-317.
3
The functional independence of mands and tacts.手势语和听语的独立性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):5-19. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-5.
6
An analysis of the functional equivalence of stimulus class members.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1968 Sep;6(3):384-90. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(68)90119-7.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验