Iida Yasunori, Obitsu Yukio, Shigematsu Hiroshi
Second Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Japan.
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jun;54(6):233-8. doi: 10.1007/pl00022242.
We tried to experimentally clarify the flow dynamic differences under flow competitive conditions between the internal thoracic artery (ITA) and gastroepiploic artery (GEA) as in-situ arterial bypass conduits.
The ITA and the GEA were anastomosed close together to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in 8 pigs. Flow characteristics of the ITA and the GEA were analyzed using a transit time flowmeter under the following flow competitive conditions; condition A: the ITA, GEA and LAD were left open, condition B: either of the ITA or GEA were clamped and the LAD was left open, condition C: the ITA and GEA were open but the proximal LAD was clamped, condition D: either of the ITA or GEA were clamped and the proximal LAD was also clamped.
The flow volume of the ITA was significantly (p<0.001) greater than that of the GEA in condition A (27 +/- 11 ml/min vs. -4 +/- 9 ml/min), B (26 +/- 17 ml/min vs. -1 +/- 14 ml/min) and C (38 +/- 14 ml/min vs. 0 +/- 4 ml/min), but did not differ (p=0.685) in condition D (29 +/- 6 ml/min vs. 31 +/- 14 ml/min). Retrograde flow in systole and antegrade flow in diastole was seen in the GEA in condition A, B and C.
Under flow competitive conditions, flow of the GEA was inferior to that of the ITA. These data suggested that the GEA is more sensitive to competitive flow than the ITA. This may be due to anatomical differences between these in-situ bypass conduits.
我们试图通过实验阐明胸廓内动脉(ITA)和胃网膜动脉(GEA)作为原位动脉搭桥管道在血流竞争条件下的血流动力学差异。
在8头猪身上将ITA和GEA紧密吻合至左前降支动脉(LAD)。在以下血流竞争条件下,使用渡越时间流量计分析ITA和GEA的血流特征;条件A:ITA、GEA和LAD均保持开放;条件B:夹闭ITA或GEA中的任意一个,LAD保持开放;条件C:ITA和GEA开放,但夹闭LAD近端;条件D:夹闭ITA或GEA中的任意一个,同时也夹闭LAD近端。
在条件A(27±11 ml/min对-4±9 ml/min)、B(26±17 ml/min对-1±14 ml/min)和C(38±14 ml/min对0±4 ml/min)下,ITA的血流量显著大于GEA(p<0.001),但在条件D下两者无差异(p=0.685)(29±6 ml/min对31±14 ml/min)。在条件A、B和C下,GEA出现收缩期逆向血流和舒张期正向血流。
在血流竞争条件下,GEA的血流低于ITA。这些数据表明,GEA比ITA对竞争性血流更敏感。这可能是由于这些原位搭桥管道之间的解剖学差异所致。