Hlatky Mark A, Melsop Kathryn A, Boothroyd Derek B
Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5405, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 19;97(12A):59G-65G. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
Diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease (CAD) commonly coexist, and thus effective, cost-effective management strategies are needed. Intensive management of diabetes has been shown to increase medical costs while yielding better outcomes, with an acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio of <50,000 dollars per life-year added. On the basis of clinical trial findings in the 1970s and 1980s, coronary bypass surgery was cost-effective compared with medical therapy in the treatment of extensive CAD. Few trials have compared angioplasty with medical therapy, and its cost-effectiveness is not well established. The economic outcomes of contemporary coronary revascularization, especially angioplasty, compared with contemporary medical therapy must be evaluated. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial will collect extensive economic data and examine the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies to manage diabetes and CAD in patients with both disorders.
糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)常常并存,因此需要有效的、具有成本效益的管理策略。强化糖尿病管理已显示会增加医疗成本,但能产生更好的结果,每增加一个生命年的可接受成本效益比<50,000美元。基于20世纪70年代和80年代的临床试验结果,在治疗广泛CAD方面,冠状动脉搭桥手术与药物治疗相比具有成本效益。很少有试验将血管成形术与药物治疗进行比较,其成本效益尚未明确确立。必须评估当代冠状动脉血运重建,尤其是血管成形术与当代药物治疗相比的经济结果。糖尿病患者的旁路血管成形术血运重建调查2(BARI 2D)试验将收集广泛的经济数据,并研究在患有这两种疾病的患者中管理糖尿病和CAD的替代策略的成本效益。