Suppr超能文献

哈内曼对千分之五十药力的实验:对其病例簿的进一步回顾

Hahnemann's experiments with 50 millesimal potencies: a further review of his casebooks.

作者信息

Adler U C, Adler M S

机构信息

Homeopathy Postgraduation Program, Jundiaí School of Medicine, Av. Moema, 170. Cj 52., 04077-020 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Homeopathy. 2006 Jul;95(3):171-81. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2006.03.003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A review of Hahnemann's clinical records at the Institute for History of Medicine of the Robert Bosch Foundation in Stuttgart shows that until the end of his life, Hahnemann continued to refine his clinical method, based on clinical cases. His "most perfected method" motivated him to write the sixth edition of the The Organon of the Healing Art, proposing solutions controlling the side effects he observed with repeated doses of homeopathic medicines. Unfortunately, this was published many years posthumously. The sixth edition of The Organon introduced the fifty-millesimal scale.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the clinical cases treated with fifty-millesimal potencies and analyze Hahnemann's use of them.

RESULTS

1836 prescriptions of fifty-millesimal potencies were found, between 1837 and 1843 in three phases: initially sporadic; later compared regularly to centesimal dynamizations; and finally systematically. Thirty five medicines were identified in fifty-millesimal prescriptions, seven in potencies higher than 10 and only 3 (Sulphur, Mercurius solubilis and Rhus toxicodendron) used in the 30th degree. This accords with Haehl's information about the remedies in Hahnemann's case of fifty-millesimal potencies.

CONCLUSIONS

Hahnemann probably decided to write the sixth edition, in 1840, to incorporate his latest experience with the repetition of potentized doses and periodically modified potencies. He must have revised it after February 1842 to include his latest findings with fifty-millesimal potencies in ascending degrees. Hahnemann's conception about the superiority of the fifty-millesimal in comparison with the centesimal dynamization was based on a significant number of experiments with the two scales.

摘要

背景

对位于斯图加特的罗伯特·博世基金会医学史研究所内哈内曼的临床记录进行回顾后发现,直至生命尽头,哈内曼仍在基于临床病例不断完善其临床方法。他的“最完善方法”促使他撰写了《治疗艺术的工具论》第六版,书中提出了控制他在多次重复服用顺势疗法药物时所观察到的副作用的解决方案。遗憾的是,该书在他去世多年后才得以出版。《工具论》第六版引入了五十分之一稀释度。

目的

确定使用五十分之一稀释度药物治疗的临床病例,并分析哈内曼对其的使用情况。

结果

在1837年至1843年间分三个阶段共发现了1836份使用五十分之一稀释度药物的处方:最初是零星出现;之后定期与百分之一稀释度药物进行对比;最后则是系统地使用。在五十分之一稀释度的处方中确定了35种药物,其中7种的稀释度高于10,只有3种(硫磺、可溶性汞和毒漆树)使用到了第30度。这与黑尔关于哈内曼使用五十分之一稀释度药物病例中所用药物的信息相符。

结论

哈内曼可能在1840年决定撰写第六版,以纳入他在重复服用增效剂量和定期调整稀释度方面的最新经验。他必定在1842年2月之后对其进行了修订,以纳入他在五十分之一稀释度药物递增度数方面的最新发现。哈内曼认为五十分之一稀释度药物相较于百分之一稀释度药物具有优越性,这是基于对这两种稀释度进行的大量实验得出的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验