Pascal Chris B
Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Suite 750, Tower Building, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2006 Jul;231(7):1264-70. doi: 10.1177/153537020623100712.
This paper discusses the experiences of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) with issues involving complainants who make allegations of research misconduct. The paper describes the legal framework for complainant issues, the various roles of the complainant as the allegation of misconduct proceeds through the steps of investigation and resolution, how allegations of retaliation against the complainant are handled, the responsibilities of ORI and of the research institution where the alleged misconduct occurred, and ORI's experience with several cases of alleged retaliation. In each of these areas, the paper attempts to provide guidance to prospective complainants, research institutions, and other interested persons on effective ways to approach the various problems and concerns that arise, while maintaining a balance between the needs of the complainant, the accused, the research institution handling the allegation, and ORI.
本文讨论了研究诚信办公室(ORI)处理涉及指控研究不当行为的投诉人的相关问题的经验。本文描述了投诉人问题的法律框架、投诉人在不当行为指控经过调查和解决步骤过程中的各种角色、如何处理对投诉人的报复指控、ORI以及被指控发生不当行为的研究机构的责任,以及ORI处理几起报复指控案件的经验。在上述每个领域,本文试图为潜在的投诉人、研究机构及其他相关人员提供指导,说明处理出现的各种问题和担忧的有效方法,同时在投诉人、被指控者、处理指控的研究机构以及ORI的需求之间保持平衡。