Oswald Debra L, Russel Brenda L
Marquette University, Department of Psychology, P.O. 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
J Sex Res. 2006 Feb;43(1):87-95. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552302.
A large body of research has found a concerning prevalence rate of sexual coercion in heterosexual college student dating relationships; however, little research has examined how college students perceive and interpret these behaviors. In the current study we examined the impact of initiator gender and sexually coercive strategy (verbal pressure, purposeful intoxication, physical force, or control/mutual consent) on perceptions of the aggressor, victim, behavior, and relationship quality. Results indicated that men who coerce are viewed as aggressive; women who coerce are viewed as promiscuous. Targets of sexual coercion are not perceived as experiencing high levels of victimization following the incident. These findings suggest that college students do not perceive sexually coercive behaviors to be highly problematic. The results are discussed in terms of gender roles and practical implications for college student relationships.
大量研究发现,异性恋大学生恋爱关系中性胁迫的发生率令人担忧;然而,很少有研究考察大学生如何看待和解读这些行为。在本研究中,我们考察了发起者性别和性胁迫策略(言语施压、故意灌醉、身体暴力或控制/双方同意)对攻击者、受害者、行为以及关系质量认知的影响。结果表明,实施胁迫的男性被视为有攻击性;实施胁迫的女性被视为行为不检。性胁迫的目标在事件发生后并未被认为遭受了高度的伤害。这些发现表明,大学生并不认为性胁迫行为存在很大问题。我们将根据性别角色以及对大学生恋爱关系的实际影响来讨论这些结果。