Yoder Paul, Stone Wendy L
Special Education Department, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;74(3):426-35. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.426.
This randomized group experiment compared the efficacy of 2 communication interventions (Responsive Education and Prelinguistic Milieu Teaching [RPMT] and the Picture Exchange Communication System [PECS]) in 36 preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Each treatment was delivered 3 times per week, in 20-min sessions, for 6 months. The results revealed that the RPMT facilitated the frequency of generalized turn taking and generalized initiating joint attention more than did the PECS. The latter effect occurred only for children who began treatment with at least some initiating joint attention. In contrast, the PECS facilitated generalized requests more than the RPMT in children with very little initiating joint attention prior to treatment. These effect sizes were large.
这项随机分组实验比较了两种沟通干预方法(响应式教育与前语言环境教学[RPMT]以及图片交换沟通系统[PECS])对36名自闭症谱系障碍学龄前儿童的疗效。每种治疗每周进行3次,每次20分钟,为期6个月。结果显示,与PECS相比,RPMT更能促进广义轮流互动和广义发起共同注意的频率。后一种效果仅出现在那些开始治疗时至少有一些发起共同注意能力的儿童身上。相比之下,对于治疗前发起共同注意能力非常弱的儿童,PECS比RPMT更能促进广义请求。这些效应量很大。