Fang Xin, Djouhri Laiche, McMullan Simon, Berry Carol, Waxman Stephen G, Okuse Kenji, Lawson Sally N
Department of Physiology, Medical School, Bristol University, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 5;26(27):7281-92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1072-06.2006.
Binding to isolectin-B4 (IB4) and expression of tyrosine kinase A (trkA) (the high-affinity NGF receptor) have been used to define two different subgroups of nociceptive small dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. We previously showed that only nociceptors have high trkA levels. However, information about sensory and electrophysiological properties in vivo of single identified IB4-binding neurons, and about their trkA expression levels, is lacking. IB4-positive (IB4+) and small dark neurons had similar size distributions. We examined IB4-binding levels in >120 dye-injected DRG neurons with sensory and electrophysiological properties recorded in vivo. Relative immunointensities for trkA and two TTX-resistant sodium channels (Nav1.8 and Nav1.9) were also measured in these neurons. IB4+ neurons were classified as strongly or weakly IB4+. All strongly IB4+ neurons were C-nociceptor type (C-fiber nociceptive or unresponsive). Of 32 C-nociceptor-type neurons examined, approximately 50% were strongly IB4+, approximately 20% were weakly IB4+ and approximately 30% were IB4-. Adelta low-threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM) neurons were weakly IB4+ or IB4-. All 33 A-fiber nociceptors and all 44 Aalpha/beta-LTM neurons examined were IB4-. IB4+ compared with IB4- C-nociceptor-type neurons had longer somatic action potential durations and rise times, slower conduction velocities, more negative membrane potentials, and greater immunointensities for Nav1.9 but not Nav1.8. Immunointensities of IB4 binding in C-neurons were positively correlated with those of Nav1.9 but not Nav1.8. Of 23 C-neurons tested for both trkA and IB4, approximately 35% were trkA+/IB4+ but with negatively correlated immunointensities; 26% were IB4+/trkA-, and 35% were IB4-/trkA+. We conclude that strongly IB4+ DRG neurons are exclusively C-nociceptor type and that high Nav1.9 expression may contribute to their distinct membrane properties.
与异凝集素-B4(IB4)结合以及酪氨酸激酶A(trkA,即高亲和力神经生长因子受体)的表达已被用于定义伤害性小背根神经节(DRG)神经元的两个不同亚组。我们之前表明只有伤害感受器具有高trkA水平。然而,关于单个已鉴定的IB4结合神经元在体内的感觉和电生理特性以及它们的trkA表达水平的信息尚缺。IB4阳性(IB4+)神经元和小而暗的神经元具有相似的大小分布。我们检查了120多个在体内记录了感觉和电生理特性的经染料注射的DRG神经元的IB4结合水平。还测量了这些神经元中trkA和两种河豚毒素抗性钠通道(Nav1.8和Nav1.9)的相对免疫强度。IB4+神经元被分类为强IB4+或弱IB4+。所有强IB4+神经元均为C类伤害感受器类型(C纤维伤害性或无反应性)。在检查的32个C类伤害感受器类型神经元中,约50%为强IB4+,约20%为弱IB4+,约30%为IB4-。Aδ低阈值机械感受器(LTM)神经元为弱IB4+或IB4-。检查的所有33个A纤维伤害感受器和所有44个Aα/β-LTM神经元均为IB4-。与IB4-C类伤害感受器类型神经元相比,IB4+神经元具有更长的体细胞动作电位持续时间和上升时间、更慢的传导速度、更负的膜电位以及更高的Nav1.9免疫强度,但Nav1.8免疫强度无差异。C神经元中IB4结合的免疫强度与Nav1.9的免疫强度呈正相关,但与Nav1.8无关。在对trkA和IB4都进行检测的23个C神经元中,约35%为trkA+/IB4+,但免疫强度呈负相关;26%为IB4+/trkA-,35%为IB4-/trkA+。我们得出结论,强IB4+ DRG神经元 exclusively 为C类伤害感受器类型,并且高Nav1.9表达可能导致它们独特的膜特性。 (注:原文中“exclusively”翻译为“专门地、仅仅、唯独”等意思,这里结合语境翻译为“ exclusively 为”,但感觉这个词在文中表述有点奇怪,你可再检查下原文是否准确。)