Suppr超能文献

凝胶内肽段等电聚焦作为一种改进蛋白质鉴定的工具

In-gel isoelectric focusing of peptides as a tool for improved protein identification.

作者信息

Krijgsveld Jeroen, Gauci Sharon, Dormeyer Wilma, Heck Albert J R

机构信息

Department of Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Proteome Res. 2006 Jul;5(7):1721-30. doi: 10.1021/pr0601180.

Abstract

In the analysis of proteins in complex samples, pre-fractionation is imperative to obtain the necessary depth in the number of reliable protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Here we explore isoelectric focusing of peptides (peptide IEF) as an effective fractionation step that at the same time provides the added possibility to eliminate spurious peptide identifications by filtering for pI. Peptide IEF in IPG strips is fast and sharply confines peptides to their pI. We have evaluated systematically the contribution of pI filtering and accurate mass measurements on the total number of protein identifications in a complex protein mixture (Drosophila nuclear extract). At the same time, by varying Mascot identification cutoff scores, we have monitored the false positive rate among these identifications by searching reverse protein databases. From mass spectrometric analyses at low mass accuracy using an LTQ ion trap, false positive rates can be minimized by filtering of peptides not focusing at their expected pI. Analyses using an LTQ-FT mass spectrometer delivers low false positive rates by itself due to the high mass accuracy. In a direct comparison of peptide IEF with SDS-PAGE as a pre-fractionation step, IEF delivered 25% and 43% more proteins when identified using FT-MS and LTQ-MS, respectively. Cumulatively, 2190 non redundant proteins were identified in the Drosophila nuclear extract at a false positive rate of 0.5%. Of these, 1751 proteins (80%) were identified after peptide IEF and FT-MS alone. Overall, we show that peptide IEF allows to increase the confidence level of protein identifications, and is more sensitive than SDS-PAGE.

摘要

在复杂样品的蛋白质分析中,预分级对于通过质谱获得可靠蛋白质鉴定数量的必要深度至关重要。在此,我们探索肽段等电聚焦(肽段IEF)作为一种有效的分级步骤,该步骤同时提供了通过筛选pI消除虚假肽段鉴定的额外可能性。在IPG胶条中进行肽段IEF速度快,能将肽段严格限制在其pI范围内。我们系统评估了pI筛选和精确质量测量对复杂蛋白质混合物(果蝇核提取物)中蛋白质鉴定总数的贡献。同时,通过改变Mascot鉴定截止分数,我们通过搜索反向蛋白质数据库监测了这些鉴定中的假阳性率。使用LTQ离子阱进行低质量精度的质谱分析时,通过筛选未聚焦在预期pI的肽段可将假阳性率降至最低。使用LTQ-FT质谱仪进行分析时,由于高质量精度,其自身的假阳性率较低。在将肽段IEF与SDS-PAGE作为预分级步骤的直接比较中,当分别使用FT-MS和LTQ-MS进行鉴定时,IEF分别多鉴定出25%和43%的蛋白质。累计而言,在果蝇核提取物中以0.5%的假阳性率鉴定出2190种非冗余蛋白质。其中,仅在肽段IEF和FT-MS之后就鉴定出1751种蛋白质(80%)。总体而言,我们表明肽段IEF能够提高蛋白质鉴定的置信度,并且比SDS-PAGE更灵敏。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验