De Paúl Joaquín, Asla Nagore, Pérez-Albéniz Alicia, de Cádiz Bárbara Torres-Gómez
University of the Basque Country, Spain.
J Interpers Violence. 2006 Aug;21(8):1018-45. doi: 10.1177/0886260506290411.
The objective is to know if high-risk mothers for child physical abuse differ in their evaluations, attributions, negative affect, disciplinary choices for children's behavior, and expectations of compliance. The effect of a stressor and the introduction of mitigating information are analyzed. Forty-seven high-risk and 48 matched low-risk mothers participated in the study. Mothers' information processing and disciplinary choices were examined using six vignettes depicting a child engaging in different transgressions. A four-factor design with repeated measures on the last two factors was used. High-risk mothers reported more hostile intent, global and internal attributions, more use of power assertion discipline, and less induction. A risk group by child transgression interaction and a risk group by mitigating information interaction were found. Results support the social information-processing model of child physical abuse, which suggests that high-risk mothers process child-related information differently and use more power assertive and less inductive disciplinary techniques.
目的是了解有虐待儿童高风险的母亲在评估、归因、消极情绪、对儿童行为的纪律处分选择以及对服从的期望方面是否存在差异。分析了应激源的影响以及缓解信息的引入。47名高风险母亲和48名匹配的低风险母亲参与了该研究。使用六个描述儿童进行不同违规行为的 vignette 来检查母亲的信息处理和纪律处分选择。采用四因素设计,对最后两个因素进行重复测量。高风险母亲报告了更多的敌意意图、整体和内在归因、更多地使用强制纪律,以及较少的诱导。发现了一个由儿童违规行为与风险组的交互作用以及由缓解信息与风险组的交互作用。结果支持了儿童身体虐待的社会信息处理模型,该模型表明高风险母亲对与儿童相关的信息处理方式不同,并且使用更多的强制和更少的诱导性纪律技术。