Suppr超能文献

鼻饲与持续性植物状态患者:普通手段还是特殊手段?

Tube feedings and persistent vegetative state patients: ordinary or extraordinary means?

作者信息

Clark Peter

机构信息

Department of Theology, Saint Joseph's University, 5600 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19135-1395, USA.

出版信息

Christ Bioeth. 2006 Apr;12(1):43-64. doi: 10.1080/13803600600629934.

Abstract

This article looks at the late John Paul II's allocution on artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) and the implications his statement will have on the ordinary-extraordinary care distinction. The purpose of this article is threefold: first, to examine the medical condition of a persistent vegetative state (PVS); second, to examine and analyze the Catholic Church's tradition on the ordinary-extraordinary means distinction; and third, to analyze the ethics behind the pope's recent allocution in regards to PVS patients as a matter of conscience. Rather than providing clarification, I argue that the papal allocution has raised many difficult questions. People in situations where decisions must be made about withdrawal or continued ANH are in need of guidance. Moreover, additional analysis is needed to determine whether the papal allocution is in conflict with the traditional Catholic medical ethics understanding of the ordinary-extraordinary care distinction.

摘要

本文探讨已故教皇约翰·保罗二世关于人工营养与水合作用(ANH)的训谕,以及他的声明对常规与特殊护理区分的影响。本文目的有三:其一,审视持续性植物状态(PVS)的医学状况;其二,审视并分析天主教会在常规与特殊手段区分方面的传统;其三,从良知角度分析教皇近期关于PVS患者的训谕背后的伦理问题。我认为,教皇的训谕非但没有给出明确解释,反而引发了许多难题。面临必须就停止或继续进行ANH做出决定的人们需要指导。此外,还需要进一步分析以确定教皇的训谕是否与天主教传统医学伦理对常规与特殊护理区分的理解相冲突。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验