• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左卡巴斯汀鼻喷雾剂与色甘酸钠鼻喷雾剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的双盲比较

Double-blind comparison of levocabastine nasal spray with sodium cromoglycate nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Palma-Carlos A G, Chieira C, Conde T A, Cordeiro J A

机构信息

Immunology Institute, Santa Maria Hospital, University of Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Ann Allergy. 1991 Oct;67(4):394-8.

PMID:1683189
Abstract

Nasal levocabastine (0.5 mg/mL) was evaluated for efficacy and tolerance against sodium cromoglycate (20 mg/mL) in a 2-week double-blind trial in 27 and 29 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Globally at 2 weeks, the investigators found a 74% response rate in the levocabastine patients versus a 50% response rate in the cromoglycate patients (P less than .10). Sneezing responded better to levocabastine than to cromoglycate according to three efficacy indicators derived from patient diary ratings of symptom severity: sum of severity scores over the total treatment period as a percentage of the theoretical maximum sum of severity scores (median: 19% versus 41%, P = .01); percentage of symptom-free days (median: 46% versus 22%, P less than .07); percentage of days with moderate or severe symptoms (median: 0% versus 29%, P = .004). Further, the percentage of days with moderate or severe runny nose was lower than in cromoglycate patients (median: 0% versus 25%, P = .09). Although no significant differences were found for itchy nose, blocked nose, and ocular symptoms, severities tended to be generally less under levocabastine than under sodium cromoglycate. Adverse experiences were low level and of similar incidence in the two groups. It is concluded that in a q.i.d. schedule, levocabastine nasal spray is more efficacious than sodium cromoglycate in relieving sneezing and that it is equally well tolerated.

摘要

在一项为期2周的双盲试验中,对27例和29例季节性变应性鼻炎患者评估了鼻用左卡巴斯汀(0.5mg/mL)相对于色甘酸钠(20mg/mL)的疗效和耐受性。在2周时,研究人员发现左卡巴斯汀组的有效率为74%,而色甘酸钠组为50%(P<0.10)。根据患者症状严重程度日记评分得出的三个疗效指标,打喷嚏对左卡巴斯汀的反应比对色甘酸钠更好:整个治疗期间严重程度评分总和占理论最大严重程度评分总和的百分比(中位数:19%对41%,P=0.01);无症状天数的百分比(中位数:46%对22%,P<0.07);有中度或重度症状天数的百分比(中位数:0%对29%,P=0.004)。此外,有中度或重度流涕天数的百分比低于色甘酸钠组患者(中位数:0%对25%,P=0.09)。虽然在鼻痒、鼻塞和眼部症状方面未发现显著差异,但左卡巴斯汀治疗下的严重程度总体上往往低于色甘酸钠。两组的不良事件发生率较低且相似。得出结论,按每日四次给药方案,左卡巴斯汀鼻喷雾剂在缓解打喷嚏方面比色甘酸钠更有效,且耐受性相同。

相似文献

1
Double-blind comparison of levocabastine nasal spray with sodium cromoglycate nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.左卡巴斯汀鼻喷雾剂与色甘酸钠鼻喷雾剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的双盲比较
Ann Allergy. 1991 Oct;67(4):394-8.
2
Levocabastine nasal spray better than sodium cromoglycate and placebo in the topical treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.左卡巴斯汀鼻喷雾剂在季节性变应性鼻炎局部治疗中比色甘酸钠和安慰剂效果更佳。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991 Apr;87(4):873-8. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(91)90136-c.
3
Levocabastine: a new topical approach for the treatment of paediatric allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.左卡巴斯汀:一种治疗儿童过敏性鼻结膜炎的新局部用药方法。
Rhinol Suppl. 1992 Sep;13:39-49.
4
Intranasal levocabastine provides fast and effective protection from nasal allergen challenge.鼻内使用左卡巴斯汀可快速有效地预防鼻过敏原激发。
Rhinology. 1996 Sep;34(3):140-3.
5
Intranasal levocabastine for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.鼻内用左卡巴斯汀治疗季节性变应性鼻炎:一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Rhinology. 1995 Sep;33(3):121-5.
6
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of topical levocabastine and sodium cromoglycate in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in children.局部用左卡巴斯汀和色甘酸钠治疗儿童季节性变应性鼻结膜炎的疗效和耐受性比较。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1994 Nov;5(4):209-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1994.tb00241.x.
7
Effectiveness of azelastine nasal spray compared with oral cetirizine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.氮卓斯汀鼻喷雾剂与口服西替利嗪治疗季节性变应性鼻炎患者的疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):543-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.04.012.
8
Efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and tolerability of mometasone furoate, levocabastine, and disodium cromoglycate nasal sprays in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.糠酸莫米松、左卡巴斯汀和色甘酸钠鼻喷雾剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效、成本效益及耐受性
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Sep;95(3):272-82. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61225-2.
9
Safety and efficacy of topical levocabastine compared with oral terfenadine.
Ann Allergy. 1994 May;72(5):429-34.
10
Comparative efficacy and safety of azelastine and levocabastine nasal sprays in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.氮卓斯汀和左卡巴斯汀鼻喷雾剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性比较
Arzneimittelforschung. 2001;51(5):387-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300052.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a review of the role of topical levocabastine.变应性鼻结膜炎的治疗:局部左卡巴斯汀的作用综述。
Mediators Inflamm. 1995;4(7):S31-8. doi: 10.1155/S0962935195000822.
2
Topical levocabastine-a review of therapeutic efficacy compared with topical sodium cromoglycate and oral terfenadine on days with high pollen counts.局部左旋西替利嗪——在花粉计数高的日子里,与局部色甘酸钠和口服特非那定相比的疗效评价。
Mediators Inflamm. 1995;4(7):S21-5. doi: 10.1155/S0962935195000809.
3
Safety and tolerability profiles of intranasal antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
鼻内用抗组胺药和鼻内用皮质类固醇治疗变应性鼻炎的安全性和耐受性概况。
Drug Saf. 2003;26(12):863-93. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326120-00003.
4
Levocabastine. An update of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the topical treatment of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis.左卡巴斯汀。其在过敏性鼻炎和结膜炎局部治疗中的药理学、临床疗效及耐受性的最新进展。
Drugs. 1995 Dec;50(6):1032-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550060-00009.
5
The pharmacokinetic properties of topical levocabastine. A review.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995 Oct;29(4):221-30. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199529040-00002.
6
The antihistamines of the nineties.九十年代的抗组胺药。
Clin Rev Allergy. 1993 Spring;11(1):111-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02802296.