Ring Nicola, Coull Alison, Howie Catherine, Murphy-Black Tricia, Watterson Andrew
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Int J Nurs Pract. 2006 Aug;12(4):232-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00569.x.
Best Practice Statements (BPS) are designed to facilitate evidence-based practice. This descriptive, exploratory study evaluated the impact of five of these statements in Scotland. A postal survey of 1,278 registered nurses was undertaken to determine use of these statements and their perceived benefits (response rate: 42%). Use of the BPS differed across clinical sites and some statements were more likely to be used than others. Identified barriers and drivers to their use were similar to factors known to encourage or hinder evidence-based practice generally. Although approximately 25% of clinical respondents reported using the BPS, most respondents reported perceived benefits to patients usually through quality improvement. Results highlight the importance of facilitation and supportive contexts in encouraging clinical use of these statements. Findings suggest that variation in clinical implementation of the BPS need to be addressed locally and nationally if their benefits are to be maximized.
最佳实践声明(BPS)旨在促进循证实践。这项描述性探索性研究评估了其中五项声明在苏格兰的影响。对1278名注册护士进行了邮寄调查,以确定这些声明的使用情况及其感知到的益处(回复率:42%)。BPS的使用在不同临床场所存在差异,有些声明比其他声明更有可能被使用。确定的使用障碍和驱动因素与通常已知的鼓励或阻碍循证实践的因素相似。虽然约25%的临床受访者报告使用了BPS,但大多数受访者报告通常通过质量改进为患者带来了感知到的益处。结果突出了促进和支持性环境在鼓励临床使用这些声明方面的重要性。研究结果表明,如果要最大限度地发挥BPS的益处,就需要在地方和国家层面解决其临床实施中的差异问题。